770
Views
133
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Moderate alcohol consumption and cognitive risk

&
Pages 465-484 | Published online: 11 Aug 2011

Figures & data

Figure 1 Cumulative sum histograms (heavy lines) of numbers of studies that did not report various ratios or risk but instead reported “Worse” (heavy solid gray line), “NoDiff” (left, heavy solid black line), or “Better” (right, heavy solid black line) cognition in “social” drinkers (not alcoholics) versus nondrinkers from 1975 to 2011. Thin dotted line at the lower right plots the cumulative sum histogram for studies that reported better cognition and used a MSE to evaluate cognition (b+mse). Thin dashed line plots the cumulative sum histogram for studies of subjects who were ≥55 years of age (gte55). Dashed vertical line at 1998 separates two phases of research on this question (phase I: neuropsychology; phase II: mental status). Inset table shows the breakdown by country of studies reporting worse, no different, or better cognition in drinkers.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; b, better; ge55, ≥55 years of age; HR, hazard ratio; MSE, mental status exam; NoDiff, no different; OR, odds ratio; RR, risk ratio; UK, United Kingdom; USA, United States of America.
Figure 1 Cumulative sum histograms (heavy lines) of numbers of studies that did not report various ratios or risk but instead reported “Worse” (heavy solid gray line), “NoDiff” (left, heavy solid black line), or “Better” (right, heavy solid black line) cognition in “social” drinkers (not alcoholics) versus nondrinkers from 1975 to 2011. Thin dotted line at the lower right plots the cumulative sum histogram for studies that reported better cognition and used a MSE to evaluate cognition (b+mse). Thin dashed line plots the cumulative sum histogram for studies of subjects who were ≥55 years of age (gte55). Dashed vertical line at 1998 separates two phases of research on this question (phase I: neuropsychology; phase II: mental status). Inset table shows the breakdown by country of studies reporting worse, no different, or better cognition in drinkers.

Table 1 Cognitive performance in drinkers in “non-ratio” studies, 1977–1986, 1986–1996, and 1997–present

Figure 2 (A) Forest plot of all 446 XRs (white dots) plus or minus their 95% CIs (horizontal “whiskers”) from 74 studies providing ratios; ratios are listed in order from smallest to largest. XRwm is the weighted (wt = 1/SEM2) mean of all 446 ratios from a random-effects meta-analysis model with 95% CI in parentheses. Mean value ±95% CI is to the left of and significantly less than the thick solid vertical line at 1.00 that denotes no difference; this value indicated on the plot’s x axis with ±95% CI (vertical dashed lines). (B) Histogram of the probability density of the log(XR) values with a superimposed smooth probability density curve (solid line) and a superimposed normal distribution density curve (dashed line) calculated using the mean and variance of log(XR). XRm is the simple (not weighted) antilog of the mean of all log(XR) values with the 95% CI in parentheses; this value indicated on the plot’s x axis with ±95% CI (vertical dashed lines). Small inset graph on left is a normal Q–Q plot showing normality and departures from normality of the log(XR) distribution. Small inset graph on right is funnel plot with P-values for regression (left) and rank correlation (right) tests for asymmetry across top. Note that XRm is identical to XRwm.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; NoQuitters, no quitters; OR, odds ratio; Q–Q, quantile–quantile; RR, risk ratio; SEM, standard error of the mean; wt, weight; XRs, hazard ratios, odds ratios, and risk ratios; XRwm, weighted mean ratio.
Figure 2 (A) Forest plot of all 446 XRs (white dots) plus or minus their 95% CIs (horizontal “whiskers”) from 74 studies providing ratios; ratios are listed in order from smallest to largest. XRwm is the weighted (wt = 1/SEM2) mean of all 446 ratios from a random-effects meta-analysis model with 95% CI in parentheses. Mean value ±95% CI is to the left of and significantly less than the thick solid vertical line at 1.00 that denotes no difference; this value indicated on the plot’s x axis with ±95% CI (vertical dashed lines). (B) Histogram of the probability density of the log(XR) values with a superimposed smooth probability density curve (solid line) and a superimposed normal distribution density curve (dashed line) calculated using the mean and variance of log(XR). XRm is the simple (not weighted) antilog of the mean of all log(XR) values with the 95% CI in parentheses; this value indicated on the plot’s x axis with ±95% CI (vertical dashed lines). Small inset graph on left is a normal Q–Q plot showing normality and departures from normality of the log(XR) distribution. Small inset graph on right is funnel plot with P-values for regression (left) and rank correlation (right) tests for asymmetry across top. Note that XRm is identical to XRwm.

Table 2 The 74 studies providing ratios of risk listed by decade

Figure 3 (A) Forest plot of 191 XRs (white dots) plus or minus their 95% CIs (horizontal “whiskers”) from 19 studies providing ratios with a reference group that did not include former drinkers. (B) Histogram of the probability density of the log(XR) values with a superimposed smooth probability density curve (solid line) and a superimposed normal distribution density curve (dashed line) calculated using the mean and variance of log(XR).

Notes: The XRwm in is close to that seen in . Other conventions are as for .

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; NoQuitters, no quitters; OR, odds ratio; Q–Q, quantile–quantile; RR, risk ratio; SEM, standard error of the mean; XRs, hazard ratios, odds ratios, and risk ratios; XRwm, weighted mean ratio.
Figure 3 (A) Forest plot of 191 XRs (white dots) plus or minus their 95% CIs (horizontal “whiskers”) from 19 studies providing ratios with a reference group that did not include former drinkers. (B) Histogram of the probability density of the log(XR) values with a superimposed smooth probability density curve (solid line) and a superimposed normal distribution density curve (dashed line) calculated using the mean and variance of log(XR).Notes: The XRwm in Figure 3A is close to that seen in Figure 2. Other conventions are as for Figure 2.

Figure 4 Forest plot of 23 XRs plus or minus their 95% CIs (horizontal “whiskers”) from 18 studies providing ratios where drinkers were significantly worse than nondrinkers.

Abbreviations: ♀, female; ♂, male; 3MS, Modified Mini-Mental State examination; 8t, 8 additional tests; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; ADL, Activities of Daily Living; AMT, Abbreviated Mental Test; CI, confidence interval; D, dementia; DECO, Deterioration Cognitive Observee test; DSST, Digit Symbol Substitution Test; HAMT, Hodkinson Abbreviated Mental Test; HR, hazard ratio; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; MSE, mental status exam; NINCDS/ADRDA, National Institute of Neurological Communicative Disorders and Stroke/Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria for AD; NoDiff, no different; OR, odds ratio; RR, risk ratio; TELE, telephone screen for cognitive impairment; WDRT, Word Delay Recall Test; XRs, hazard ratios, odds ratios, and risk ratios; XRwm, weighted mean ratio.

Notes: Uppercase “H” at left of vertical reference line at 1 indicates ratios from heavy drinkers; “e4” indicates presence of apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 allele. Other conventions as in . Note that the XRwm of 2.43 (95% CI: 1.95–3.03) is much larger than that seen in and is significantly greater than 1.
Figure 4 Forest plot of 23 XRs plus or minus their 95% CIs (horizontal “whiskers”) from 18 studies providing ratios where drinkers were significantly worse than nondrinkers.Abbreviations: ♀, female; ♂, male; 3MS, Modified Mini-Mental State examination; 8t, 8 additional tests; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; ADL, Activities of Daily Living; AMT, Abbreviated Mental Test; CI, confidence interval; D, dementia; DECO, Deterioration Cognitive Observee test; DSST, Digit Symbol Substitution Test; HAMT, Hodkinson Abbreviated Mental Test; HR, hazard ratio; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; MSE, mental status exam; NINCDS/ADRDA, National Institute of Neurological Communicative Disorders and Stroke/Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria for AD; NoDiff, no different; OR, odds ratio; RR, risk ratio; TELE, telephone screen for cognitive impairment; WDRT, Word Delay Recall Test; XRs, hazard ratios, odds ratios, and risk ratios; XRwm, weighted mean ratio.

Figure 5 Overall weighted mean ratios (XRwm) comparing cognitive function in drinkers and nondrinkers in the various groups analyzed. Group with number of ratios (number of studies) indicated on left; XRwm (95% confidence interval) given on right.

Note: See text for fuller description.
Abbreviations: AdjAESK, Adjusted for Age, Education, Sex, and Smoking; AlzDem, Alzheimer’s disease; casecon, case-control study; CogDec, cognitive decline; CogImp, cognitive improvement; e4, epsilon 4; heavy, heavy drinkers; light, light drinkers; mod, moderate drinkers; MSE, mental status exam; nodiff, no different; Noe4, no epsilon 4; NoMSE, no mental status exam; Noquitter, no quitters; VascDem, vascular dementia; XR, hazard ratio, odds ratio, and risk ratio; XRwm, weighted mean ratio; xsect, cross-sectional study.
Figure 5 Overall weighted mean ratios (XRwm) comparing cognitive function in drinkers and nondrinkers in the various groups analyzed. Group with number of ratios (number of studies) indicated on left; XRwm (95% confidence interval) given on right.

Figure 6 Overall weighted mean ratios (XRwm) comparing cognitive risk in drinkers and nondrinkers by country. Country with number of ratios (number of studies) indicated on left; XRwm (95% confidence interval) given on right.

Abbreviations: afr-amer, African-Americans; australia, Australia; brazil, Brazil; canada, Canada; canada-ne4, Canada, no epsilon 4; chinat, China and Taiwan; chinat-nh, China and Taiwan, no heavy drinkers; denmark, Denmark; denmark-wn, Denmark, wine drinkers; finland, Finland; finl-ne4h, Finland, no epsilon 4, no heavy drinkers; france, France; germany, Germany; greece, Greece; holland, the Netherlands; hungary, Hungary; hungary-nh, Hungary, no heavy drinkers; italy, Italy; japan, Japan; japan-amer, Japanese Americans; japan-nh, Japan, no heavy drinkers; korea, Korea; nigeria, Nigeria; spain, Spain; sweden, Sweden; UK, United Kingdom; USA, United States of America; XR, hazard ratio, odds ratio, and risk ratio.
Figure 6 Overall weighted mean ratios (XRwm) comparing cognitive risk in drinkers and nondrinkers by country. Country with number of ratios (number of studies) indicated on left; XRwm (95% confidence interval) given on right.