130
Views
39
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Evaluating preferences for profiles of GLP-1 receptor agonists among injection-naïve type 2 diabetes patients in the UK

, , , , &
Pages 1611-1622 | Published online: 09 Nov 2015

Figures & data

Table 1 Attributes and levels for the discrete choice experiment

Table 3 Part-worth utilities, RI, and rankings of attributes in overall sample

Figure 1 Participant disposition.

Note: *Excludes participants unwilling/unable to travel to interview location, no shows, and cancellations.
Abbreviation: T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Figure 1 Participant disposition.

Table 2 Self-reported sociodemographic and clinical characteristics

Figure 2 Relative importance of attributes in overall sample.

Abbreviation: RI, relative importance.
Figure 2 Relative importance of attributes in overall sample.

Figure 3 Relative importance of attributes by sex.

Notes: *Statistically significant difference between sexes in preference for levels of the attribute (P<0.05). **Statistically significant difference in the relative importance of each attribute across sex (P<0.0001).
Abbreviation: RI, relative importance.
Figure 3 Relative importance of attributes by sex.

Figure 4 Relative importance of attributes by age group (<60 years vs ≥60 years).

Notes: *Statistically significant difference between age groups in preference for levels of the attribute (P<0.05). **Statistically significant difference in the relative importance of each attribute across age groups (P=0.0108).
Abbreviation: RI, relative importance.
Figure 4 Relative importance of attributes by age group (<60 years vs ≥60 years).