601
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Thermal dose fractionation affects tumour physiological response

, , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 431-440 | Received 09 Jan 2012, Accepted 23 Apr 2012, Published online: 17 Jul 2012

Figures & data

Table I.  Distribution of tumour grade, tumour site and tumour volume between treatment groups. Proportionally more high-grade tumours were present in tumours treated with three to four fractions per week.

Table II.  Thermal parameters as a function of treatment group. Tumour temperatures were higher and duration of each hyperthermia treatment shorter in the one fraction per week group compared to the three to four fractions per week group. The total cumulative thermal dose, quantified as CEM43T90 was slightly higher in the one fraction per week group but was within the target range of 20–50 CEM43T90. It is doubtful that the small absolute difference in total CEM43T90 values between groups is clinically significant.

Figure 1. Percentage tumour volume change at end of treatment as a function of treatment group. There was a statistically significant greater reduction in tumour volume at the end of treatment in tumours treated with one fraction per week compared to tumours treated with three to four fractions per week (p = 0.0022).

Figure 1. Percentage tumour volume change at end of treatment as a function of treatment group. There was a statistically significant greater reduction in tumour volume at the end of treatment in tumours treated with one fraction per week compared to tumours treated with three to four fractions per week (p = 0.0022).

Figure 2. Median number of measured pO2 points <2.5 mm Hg (24 h post treatment minus pretreatment) as a function of the percentage change in tumour volume at the end of treatment. Note the direction of the x-axis; decreasing tumour volume proceeds to the right. The pattern is a greater tumour volume reduction in tumours where the median number of measured points <2.5 mm Hg decreases compared to the pretreatment value, i.e. improving oxygenation (p = 0.0138, test for zero correlation; correlation coefficient 0.41).

Figure 2. Median number of measured pO2 points <2.5 mm Hg (24 h post treatment minus pretreatment) as a function of the percentage change in tumour volume at the end of treatment. Note the direction of the x-axis; decreasing tumour volume proceeds to the right. The pattern is a greater tumour volume reduction in tumours where the median number of measured points <2.5 mm Hg decreases compared to the pretreatment value, i.e. improving oxygenation (p = 0.0138, test for zero correlation; correlation coefficient 0.41).

Table III.  Median descriptors of tumour oxygenation prior to treatment versus 24 h after the first hyperthermia fraction. These data are for all tumours, in both fractionation groups combined. The change in median values is in a direction consistent with reduction in oxygenation, without respect to fractionation group.

Figure 3. Difference in median percentile values for the apparent diffusion coefficient of water (ADC), post-treatment relative to pretreatment, as a function of the individual percentile as a function of treatment group. The greatest decrease occurred in the low end of the diffusion range in dogs receiving one fraction per week (0.0023 ≤ p ≤ 0.4322). 5HT, one hyperthermia fraction per week; 20 HT, three to four hyperthermia fractions per week.

Figure 3. Difference in median percentile values for the apparent diffusion coefficient of water (ADC), post-treatment relative to pretreatment, as a function of the individual percentile as a function of treatment group. The greatest decrease occurred in the low end of the diffusion range in dogs receiving one fraction per week (0.0023 ≤ p ≤ 0.4322). 5HT, one hyperthermia fraction per week; 20 HT, three to four hyperthermia fractions per week.

Figure 4. Percentile distribution of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in an individual tumour before treatment and at the end of treatment. In this subject, treatment led to a generalised decrease in water diffusion but regions where water diffusion was more restricted prior to treatment (low ADC values) were characterised by greater decreases. Every 1000th point is shown. Fewer points are present after treatment because the tumour was smaller. Pre, before treatment.

Figure 4. Percentile distribution of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in an individual tumour before treatment and at the end of treatment. In this subject, treatment led to a generalised decrease in water diffusion but regions where water diffusion was more restricted prior to treatment (low ADC values) were characterised by greater decreases. Every 1000th point is shown. Fewer points are present after treatment because the tumour was smaller. Pre, before treatment.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.