741
Views
29
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Cytotoxicity of hepatocellular carcinoma cells to hyperthermic and ablative temperature exposures: In vitro studies and mathematical modelling

, , , &
Pages 318-323 | Received 20 Dec 2012, Accepted 30 Mar 2013, Published online: 05 Jun 2013

Figures & data

Figure 1. Schematic sketch of the experimental set-up. HCC cell lines were plated in well plates and exposed to temperatures between 45–60 °C for 0.5 to 32 min. After heating, cell viability was determined by tetrazolium-based (MTS) assay.

Figure 1. Schematic sketch of the experimental set-up. HCC cell lines were plated in well plates and exposed to temperatures between 45–60 °C for 0.5 to 32 min. After heating, cell viability was determined by tetrazolium-based (MTS) assay.

Figure 2. Temperature variations of the experiments recorded over 32 min. An initial decrease (time <3 min) was noted due to the media addition in the assay. Error bars indicate the standard deviation.

Figure 2. Temperature variations of the experiments recorded over 32 min. An initial decrease (time <3 min) was noted due to the media addition in the assay. Error bars indicate the standard deviation.

Figure 3. Survival fraction as a function of temperature and exposure time. The error bars indicate ± standard error of mean.

Figure 3. Survival fraction as a function of temperature and exposure time. The error bars indicate ± standard error of mean.

Figure 4. Points show the measured surviving fraction based on a tetrazolium survival assay. Solid line: prediction of surviving fraction via Arrhenius model for heating 0–10 min. Note: The sigmoidal shape of the 45 °C curve is due to considerable temperature variation within the first 10 min (see ).

Figure 4. Points show the measured surviving fraction based on a tetrazolium survival assay. Solid line: prediction of surviving fraction via Arrhenius model for heating 0–10 min. Note: The sigmoidal shape of the 45 °C curve is due to considerable temperature variation within the first 10 min (see Figure 2).

Table 1. Fitted Arrhenius parameters as well as compensation factor (R) derived from the fitted model parameters compared with prior R values.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.