915
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Can nurses exclude middle-ear effusion without otoscopy in young asymptomatic children in primary care?

, , , &
Pages 115-120 | Received 10 Oct 2014, Accepted 15 Feb 2015, Published online: 07 Apr 2015

Figures & data

Figure 1. Flow chart of the included children, visits, and tympanometric and spectral gradient acoustic reflectometry (SG-AR) examinations.

Figure 1. Flow chart of the included children, visits, and tympanometric and spectral gradient acoustic reflectometry (SG-AR) examinations.

Table I. Successful tympanometric examinations (n = 272) performed by the nurses.

Table II. Exclusion of middle-ear effusion (MEE) by nurses.a

Table III. Successful spectral gradient acoustic reflectometry (SG-AR) examinations (n = 332) performed by the nurses.

Figure 2. Flow chart of the clinical usefulness of excluding middle-ear effusion (MEE) based on tympanometry performed by the nurses at asymptomatic visits (n = 196). Type A and C1 tympanograms from both ears of the child were regarded as the exclusive test result for MEE. Notes: aTympanogram types: Type A (tympanometric peak pressure greater than −100 daPa); type C1 (the pressure between −100 and −199 daPa); type C2 (the pressure −200 daPa or less); type Cs (width > 300 daPa or static acoustic admittance < 0.2 mmho); and type B (flat).

Figure 2. Flow chart of the clinical usefulness of excluding middle-ear effusion (MEE) based on tympanometry performed by the nurses at asymptomatic visits (n = 196). Type A and C1 tympanograms from both ears of the child were regarded as the exclusive test result for MEE. Notes: aTympanogram types: Type A (tympanometric peak pressure greater than −100 daPa); type C1 (the pressure between −100 and −199 daPa); type C2 (the pressure −200 daPa or less); type Cs (width > 300 daPa or static acoustic admittance < 0.2 mmho); and type B (flat).