1,105
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Quantitative dynamic 18FDG-PET and tracer kinetic analysis of soft tissue sarcomas

, , , , &
Pages 1160-1167 | Received 27 Jun 2012, Accepted 04 Sep 2012, Published online: 03 Dec 2012

Figures & data

Table I. Patient cohort.

Figure 1. Dynamic 18FDG-PET sequence for patient 11 post injection showing the temporal evolution of the FDG activity. The tumor border is marked with a green line.

Figure 1. Dynamic 18FDG-PET sequence for patient 11 post injection showing the temporal evolution of the FDG activity. The tumor border is marked with a green line.

Figure 2. Time activity curves for patients 1-11 post injection showing the temporal development of the SUV peak value.

Figure 2. Time activity curves for patients 1-11 post injection showing the temporal development of the SUV peak value.

Figure 3. Two selected voxel elements for patient 10 post injection. Data points are averaged over the voxel in question and its six closest voxels. “Free” is non-metabolized 18FDG, “bound” is metabolized 18FDG, and “vascular” is the fraction of the plasma function included in the voxel element. Estimated pharmacokinetic parameters are given.

Figure 3. Two selected voxel elements for patient 10 post injection. Data points are averaged over the voxel in question and its six closest voxels. “Free” is non-metabolized 18FDG, “bound” is metabolized 18FDG, and “vascular” is the fraction of the plasma function included in the voxel element. Estimated pharmacokinetic parameters are given.

Figure 4. Parameter maps for patient 11 derived from the pharmacokinetic analysis. In addition, two static snapshot PET images obtained 2 and 45 min p.i. are shown. The tumor border is marked with a green line.

Figure 4. Parameter maps for patient 11 derived from the pharmacokinetic analysis. In addition, two static snapshot PET images obtained 2 and 45 min p.i. are shown. The tumor border is marked with a green line.

Figure 5. Patient-averaged histograms over the relevant PET-derived parameters. The dashed lines indicate one standard deviation.

Figure 5. Patient-averaged histograms over the relevant PET-derived parameters. The dashed lines indicate one standard deviation.

Table II. Summary of PET-derived values.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.