7,001
Views
310
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Stability of FDG-PET Radiomics features: An integrated analysis of test-retest and inter-observer variability

, , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1391-1397 | Received 03 May 2013, Accepted 29 May 2013, Published online: 09 Sep 2013

Figures & data

Figure 1. Schematic of the workflow applied in our study. A. Acquisition of PET images (fused CT for illustrative purposes), followed by tumor delineation. B. Extraction of Radiomics features from the defined volume of interest. C. Test-retest and inter-observer stability analysis.

Figure 1. Schematic of the workflow applied in our study. A. Acquisition of PET images (fused CT for illustrative purposes), followed by tumor delineation. B. Extraction of Radiomics features from the defined volume of interest. C. Test-retest and inter-observer stability analysis.

Figure 2. A and B. Representative images of repeated imaging of a patient from the test-retest cohort, with the 50% SUVmax tumor delineation shown outlined in green, for, respectively, the first and second baseline PET scan. C. Representative image of a patient from the inter-observer cohort, where the lesion area is outlined with the green square (fused CT for illustrative purposes). D. Enlargement of the lesion area with in different colors the five independent tumor delineations by multiple observers.

Figure 2. A and B. Representative images of repeated imaging of a patient from the test-retest cohort, with the 50% SUVmax tumor delineation shown outlined in green, for, respectively, the first and second baseline PET scan. C. Representative image of a patient from the inter-observer cohort, where the lesion area is outlined with the green square (fused CT for illustrative purposes). D. Enlargement of the lesion area with in different colors the five independent tumor delineations by multiple observers.

Figure 3. Scatter plots of stability rankings of test-retest versus inter-observer intra-class correlation coefficients. A higher rank corresponds with a higher stability. Plotted diagonal illustrates perfect correlation. A. First order statistics (ρs = 0.877, p << 0.001). B. Intensity volume histogram features (ρs = 0.572, p << 0.001). C. Geometric features (ρs = 0.663, p << 0.086). D. Textural features (ρs = 0.719, p << 0.001), with GLCM features in blue circles, GLRLM features in green triangles and GLSZM features in red squares.

Figure 3. Scatter plots of stability rankings of test-retest versus inter-observer intra-class correlation coefficients. A higher rank corresponds with a higher stability. Plotted diagonal illustrates perfect correlation. A. First order statistics (ρs = 0.877, p << 0.001). B. Intensity volume histogram features (ρs = 0.572, p << 0.001). C. Geometric features (ρs = 0.663, p << 0.086). D. Textural features (ρs = 0.719, p << 0.001), with GLCM features in blue circles, GLRLM features in green triangles and GLSZM features in red squares.
Supplemental material

Supplementary Appendix A, B, C

Download PDF (1.7 MB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.