2,915
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Rehabilitation

Prophylactic training for the prevention of radiotherapy-induced trismus – a randomised study

, , , , &
Pages 530-538 | Received 10 Sep 2013, Accepted 02 Feb 2014, Published online: 17 Mar 2014

Figures & data

Table I. Patient characteristics (n = 66).

Figure 1. Flow chart over study participation during and after RT.

Figure 1. Flow chart over study participation during and after RT.

Table II. Frequency of training from study start until 6 and12 months after completed radiotherapy (RT) and percent mean change in maximum interincisal opening (MIO) from baseline to 12 months after completed RT (n = 66).

Figure 2. Mean change in MIO (%) from baseline, during RT and up to 12 months after completed RT. The lower number of patients weeks 6 and 7 is due to dose differences resulting in shorter time-period in external beam radiotherapy (see for details).

Figure 2. Mean change in MIO (%) from baseline, during RT and up to 12 months after completed RT. The lower number of patients weeks 6 and 7 is due to dose differences resulting in shorter time-period in external beam radiotherapy (see Figure 1 for details).

Figure 3. Mean change in MIO (%) from baseline, during RT and up to 12 months after completed RT. Patients with MIO decrease > 15%, who were offered training, is shown as a separate group. The lower number of patients weeks 6 and 7 is due to dose differences resulting in shorter time-period in external beam radiotherapy (see for details).

Figure 3. Mean change in MIO (%) from baseline, during RT and up to 12 months after completed RT. Patients with MIO decrease > 15%, who were offered training, is shown as a separate group. The lower number of patients weeks 6 and 7 is due to dose differences resulting in shorter time-period in external beam radiotherapy (see Figure 1 for details).

Figure 4. Mean change in MIO (%) from baseline, during RT and up to 12 months after completed RT in patients with 3D-CRT or IMRT. 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) compared to baseline at 12 months:p = 0.22; *3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) compared to baseline at 6 weeks: p = 0.018; **3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) compared to baseline at 6 months: p = 0.040; ***3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) compared to IMRT at 6 months: p = 0.065; ****3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) compared to IMRT at 12 months: p = 0.084.

Figure 4. Mean change in MIO (%) from baseline, during RT and up to 12 months after completed RT in patients with 3D-CRT or IMRT. 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) compared to baseline at 12 months:p = 0.22; *3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) compared to baseline at 6 weeks: p = 0.018; **3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) compared to baseline at 6 months: p = 0.040; ***3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) compared to IMRT at 6 months: p = 0.065; ****3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) compared to IMRT at 12 months: p = 0.084.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.