2,402
Views
36
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

NTCP reduction for advanced head and neck cancer patients using proton therapy for complete or sequential boost treatment versus photon therapy

, , , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1658-1664 | Received 16 May 2015, Accepted 02 Jul 2015, Published online: 04 Sep 2015

Figures & data

Figure 1. Dose differences overlaid on a sagittal and axial CT slice (slice positions are indicated by white lines) between pure IMXT plan and mixed modality treatment plan (left column) as well as between pure IMXT treatment and pure IMPT treatment (right column) for two exemplary patients with primary tumor site in the oropharynx (upper row) and the hypopharynx (lower row). The elective target volume is depicted in dark red and the gross tumor volume (GTV) in blue. Dose differences are small in the sequential boost volume consisting of GTV and involved lymph nodes (not depicted), increasing in the part of the elective volume in which no sequential boost is applied (right neck in patient A, left neck in patient B) and largest in the normal tissue surrounding the elective volume.

Figure 1. Dose differences overlaid on a sagittal and axial CT slice (slice positions are indicated by white lines) between pure IMXT plan and mixed modality treatment plan (left column) as well as between pure IMXT treatment and pure IMPT treatment (right column) for two exemplary patients with primary tumor site in the oropharynx (upper row) and the hypopharynx (lower row). The elective target volume is depicted in dark red and the gross tumor volume (GTV) in blue. Dose differences are small in the sequential boost volume consisting of GTV and involved lymph nodes (not depicted), increasing in the part of the elective volume in which no sequential boost is applied (right neck in patient A, left neck in patient B) and largest in the normal tissue surrounding the elective volume.

Figure 2. Differences in NTCP between pure IMXT and pure IMPT (∆NTCPIMXT-IMPT, dark blue) and between pure IMXT and mixed modality treatment (∆NTCPIMXT-Mix, light blue) for individual patients sorted according to the ∆NTCPIMXT-IMPT values for three different toxicities. The gray dotted line indicates 10% difference used as possible selection criterion in the model-based approach.

Figure 2. Differences in NTCP between pure IMXT and pure IMPT (∆NTCPIMXT-IMPT, dark blue) and between pure IMXT and mixed modality treatment (∆NTCPIMXT-Mix, light blue) for individual patients sorted according to the ∆NTCPIMXT-IMPT values for three different toxicities. The gray dotted line indicates 10% difference used as possible selection criterion in the model-based approach.

Table I. Number of patients with ∆NTCP in the specified ranges.

Figure 3. Number of toxicities per patient for which NTCP was reduced by (a) more than 10% and (b) more than 5% compared to the pure IMXT technique. In total, seven toxicities were evaluated.

Figure 3. Number of toxicities per patient for which NTCP was reduced by (a) more than 10% and (b) more than 5% compared to the pure IMXT technique. In total, seven toxicities were evaluated.
Supplemental material

ionc_a_1071920_sm9732.zip

Download Zip (165 KB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.