1,205
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Can low-dose abdominal CT replace abdominal plain film in evaluation of acute abdominal pain?

, &
Pages 113-120 | Received 26 May 2009, Accepted 27 Aug 2009, Published online: 01 Nov 2009

Figures & data

Table I.  The number of included patients examined with the different modalities during January, February, and March in the years 2000, 2002, and 2004.

Table II.  Effective dose in millisievert (mSv) for different radiograms reported to Swedish Radiation Protection Authority.

Table III.  Radiologic and final diagnoses of the patients examined with abdominal plain film (APF).

Table IV.  Radiologic and final diagnoses of the patients examined with standard-dose computed tomography (SDCT).

Table V.  Radiologic and final diagnoses of the patients examined with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT).

Table VI.  The percentage of patients distributed between the groups A, B, C, D for the radiological methods abdominal plain film (APF), standard-dose computed tomography (SDCT), low-dose computed tomography (LDCT), and computed tomography (CT) total. Number of patients in parenthesis.

Table VII.  Average number of additional abdominal radiograms and non-abdominal radiograms (in parentheses) for the radiological methods APF, SDCT, LDCT, and CT total.

Table VIII.  The percentage of additional abdominal radiograms during admission for the radiological methods APF, SDCT, LDCT, and CT total. Number of patients in parenthesis.

Table IX.  Average calculated dose in millisievert (mSv) with original radiograms excluded and included (in parenthesis).