Twelve-month follow-up of advance provision of emergency contraception among teenage girls in Sweden—a randomized controlled trial

Figures & data

Figure 1. Flow chart of participants.

Table I. Time interval in hours (mean, SD) from unprotected intercourse to ECP intake in the Intervention group versus the Control group.

		n	Time interval (h)
			Mean (SD)
At 3-month follow-up	Intervention group (n = 154)	31	13.6 (10.4)
	Control group (n = 150)	17	25.5 (18.7)
			p = 0.007 ^a
At 12-month follow-up	Intervention group (n = 142)	57	15.3 (12.1)
	Control group (n = 119)	26	25.8 (19.8)
			p = 0.019 ^a

^aStudent's t test.

Table II. Contraceptive use and sexual risk-taking at 12-month follow-up in the Intervention group versus the Control group.

	Intervention group n = 142	Control group n = 119	p-value
Intercourse without any contraception during the last 3 months	26 (18.3%)	28 (23.7%)	ns
Condom use at latest intercourse	39 (27.5%)	37 (31.1%)	ns
Oral contraceptive use at latest intercourse	79 (55.6%)	69 (58.0%)	ns
Unprotected latest intercourse	13 (9.2%)	13 (10.9%)	ns