513
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Laboratory Studies

Conditioned medium from renal tubular epithelial cells stimulated by hypoxia influences rat bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells

, , , &
Pages 863-870 | Received 17 Mar 2010, Accepted 11 May 2010, Published online: 21 Jul 2010

Figures & data

TABLE 1. The sequences for specific PCR primer pairs and the different parameters for PCR amplification

FIGURE 1. Characterization of EPCs. (A) After 7 days in culture, attached cells exhibited a spindle-shaped endothelial cell-like morphology (original magnification × 200). (B, C, D) Adherent cells, lectin-binding (green), DiLDL uptake (red), double positive (orange) were assessed under a laser-scanning confocal microscope (original magnification × 400). The cells were further analyzed by immunofluorescence with (E) VEGFR-2, (F) CD34, and (G) CD133 antibodies (original magnification × 400).

FIGURE 1. Characterization of EPCs. (A) After 7 days in culture, attached cells exhibited a spindle-shaped endothelial cell-like morphology (original magnification × 200). (B, C, D) Adherent cells, lectin-binding (green), DiLDL uptake (red), double positive (orange) were assessed under a laser-scanning confocal microscope (original magnification × 400). The cells were further analyzed by immunofluorescence with (E) VEGFR-2, (F) CD34, and (G) CD133 antibodies (original magnification × 400).

FIGURE 2. Effect of CM on EPCs proliferation. Hypoxic CM time-dependently increased the proliferation of EPCs. Proliferative activity of EPCs became apparent at 24 h and reached the maximum at 48 h; C (control group): conditioned medium from normoxic condition; CM: conditioned medium from hypoxic condition; A, light absorbance. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 5. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared with control group 123 × 70 mm.

FIGURE 2. Effect of CM on EPCs proliferation. Hypoxic CM time-dependently increased the proliferation of EPCs. Proliferative activity of EPCs became apparent at 24 h and reached the maximum at 48 h; C (control group): conditioned medium from normoxic condition; CM: conditioned medium from hypoxic condition; A, light absorbance. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 5. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared with control group 123 × 70 mm.

FIGURE 3. Effect of hypoxic CM on EPCs migration. CM time-dependently increased the migration of EPCs. Increase of EPCs migratory capacity became apparent after 6 h and reached the maximum at 12 h; C (control group): conditioned medium from normoxic condition; CM: conditioned medium from hypoxic condition; A, light absorbance. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 5. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared with control group.

FIGURE 3. Effect of hypoxic CM on EPCs migration. CM time-dependently increased the migration of EPCs. Increase of EPCs migratory capacity became apparent after 6 h and reached the maximum at 12 h; C (control group): conditioned medium from normoxic condition; CM: conditioned medium from hypoxic condition; A, light absorbance. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 5. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared with control group.

FIGURE 4. Effect of CM on VEGF protein expression. Production of VEGF protein by EPCs in CM group was significantly greater than that in control group and reached the maximum at 48 h. C (control group): conditioned medium from normoxic condition; CM: conditioned medium from hypoxic condition; β-actin was used as a housekeeping protein. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 5. *p < 0.05 compared with control group.

FIGURE 4. Effect of CM on VEGF protein expression. Production of VEGF protein by EPCs in CM group was significantly greater than that in control group and reached the maximum at 48 h. C (control group): conditioned medium from normoxic condition; CM: conditioned medium from hypoxic condition; β-actin was used as a housekeeping protein. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 5. *p < 0.05 compared with control group.

FIGURE 5. Effect of CM on Ang-1 protein expression. Production of Ang-1 by EPCs in CM group was significantly greater than that in control group and became apparent and reached the maximum at 48 h. C (control group): conditioned medium from normoxic condition; CM: conditioned medium from hypoxic condition; β-actin was used as a housekeeping protein. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 5. *p < 0.01 compared with control group.

FIGURE 5. Effect of CM on Ang-1 protein expression. Production of Ang-1 by EPCs in CM group was significantly greater than that in control group and became apparent and reached the maximum at 48 h. C (control group): conditioned medium from normoxic condition; CM: conditioned medium from hypoxic condition; β-actin was used as a housekeeping protein. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 5. *p < 0.01 compared with control group.

FIGURE 6. Effect of CM on mRNA expression of CXCR4 production. RT-PCR: production of CXCR4 by EPCs in CM group was significantly greater than that in control group, and reached the maximum at 48 h. C (control group): conditioned medium from normoxic condition; CM: conditioned medium from hypoxic condition; β-actin was used as a housekeeping gene. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 5. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared with control group.

FIGURE 6. Effect of CM on mRNA expression of CXCR4 production. RT-PCR: production of CXCR4 by EPCs in CM group was significantly greater than that in control group, and reached the maximum at 48 h. C (control group): conditioned medium from normoxic condition; CM: conditioned medium from hypoxic condition; β-actin was used as a housekeeping gene. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 5. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared with control group.

FIGURE 7. SDF-1 expression in CM of cultured RTECs at different oxygen concentrations. SDF-1 expression of RTECs in hypoxic groups was significantly greater than that in control group and became apparent and reached the maximum with 5%O2 at 48 h. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 5. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared with control group. C: control group (20% O2).

FIGURE 7. SDF-1 expression in CM of cultured RTECs at different oxygen concentrations. SDF-1 expression of RTECs in hypoxic groups was significantly greater than that in control group and became apparent and reached the maximum with 5%O2 at 48 h. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 5. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared with control group. C: control group (20% O2).

FIGURE 8. VEGF expression in CM of cultured RTECs at different oxygen concentrations. VEGF expression of RTECs in hypoxic groups was significantly greater than that in control group and became apparent and reached the maximum with 3% O2 at 48 h. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 5. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared with control group. C: control group (20% O2).

FIGURE 8. VEGF expression in CM of cultured RTECs at different oxygen concentrations. VEGF expression of RTECs in hypoxic groups was significantly greater than that in control group and became apparent and reached the maximum with 3% O2 at 48 h. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 5. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared with control group. C: control group (20% O2).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.