427
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Study

Efficacy of Aliskiren in Japanese Chronic Kidney Disease Patients with Hypertension

, , , , &
Pages 442-447 | Received 08 Oct 2011, Accepted 09 Dec 2011, Published online: 20 Jan 2012

Figures & data

Table 1. Patients’ baseline characteristics (N = 43).

Figure 1. Changes in the consulting room blood pressure of the 150 mg/day group (A) and the 300 mg/day group (B).

Note: *Significant according to the results of a one-way ANOVA (p = 0.0045) and Tukey’s multiple comparison testing (0 vs. 5, 0 vs. 6).

Figure 1. Changes in the consulting room blood pressure of the 150 mg/day group (A) and the 300 mg/day group (B).Note: *Significant according to the results of a one-way ANOVA (p = 0.0045) and Tukey’s multiple comparison testing (0 vs. 5, 0 vs. 6).

Figure 2. Changes in the consulting room blood pressure of the high eGFR group (A) and the low eGFR group (B).

Figure 2. Changes in the consulting room blood pressure of the high eGFR group (A) and the low eGFR group (B).

Figure 3. Effect of aliskiren on urinary protein.

Figure 3. Effect of aliskiren on urinary protein.

Figure 4. Comparison of gradient of the regression lines of urinary protein values before administration (−6 to 0 months; left panel) and after administration (0 to 6 months; right panel).

Figure 4. Comparison of gradient of the regression lines of urinary protein values before administration (−6 to 0 months; left panel) and after administration (0 to 6 months; right panel).

Figure 5. Changes in the serum Cr level of the high eGFR group (A) and the low eGFR group (B).

Figure 5. Changes in the serum Cr level of the high eGFR group (A) and the low eGFR group (B).

Figure 6. Comparison of gradient of the regression lines of the serum Cr level of the high eGFR group before administration (−6 to 0 months; left panel) and after administration (0–6 months; right panel).

Figure 6. Comparison of gradient of the regression lines of the serum Cr level of the high eGFR group before administration (−6 to 0 months; left panel) and after administration (0–6 months; right panel).

Figure 7. Comparison of gradient of the regression lines of the serum Cr level of the low eGFR group before administration (−6 to 0 months; left panel) and after administration (0 to 6 months; right panel).

Figure 7. Comparison of gradient of the regression lines of the serum Cr level of the low eGFR group before administration (−6 to 0 months; left panel) and after administration (0 to 6 months; right panel).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.