919
Views
37
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Hydrogen sulphide and tempol treatments improve the blood pressure and renal excretory responses in spontaneously hypertensive rats

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 598-605 | Received 14 Oct 2013, Accepted 04 Dec 2013, Published online: 06 Feb 2014

Figures & data

Table 1. Effect of exogenous NaHS, tempol, and a combination of NaHS and tempol on systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and renal cortical blood perfusion (RCBP) in spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Table 2. Effect of exogenous NaHS, tempol, and a combination of NaHS and tempol on body weight, water intake, food intake, urine flow rate (UFR), plasma H2S, and urinary H2S in spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Figure 1. Oxidant and antioxidant biochemical markers. T-SOD (A), MDA (B), NO (C), and T- AOC (D) of WKY, SHR, SHR + NaHS, SHR + Tempol, and SHR + NaHS + Tempol. The values are mean ± SEM (n = 6). Statistical analysis was done by a repeated measure one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test. *p < 0.05 versus WKY; †p < 0.05 versus SHR; δp < 0.05 versus SHR + NaHS; #p < 0.05 versus SHR + Tempol. Note: T-SOD, total superoxide dismutase; MDA, malondialdehyde; NO, nitric oxide; T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity.

Figure 1. Oxidant and antioxidant biochemical markers. T-SOD (A), MDA (B), NO (C), and T- AOC (D) of WKY, SHR, SHR + NaHS, SHR + Tempol, and SHR + NaHS + Tempol. The values are mean ± SEM (n = 6). Statistical analysis was done by a repeated measure one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test. *p < 0.05 versus WKY; †p < 0.05 versus SHR; δp < 0.05 versus SHR + NaHS; #p < 0.05 versus SHR + Tempol. Note: T-SOD, total superoxide dismutase; MDA, malondialdehyde; NO, nitric oxide; T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity.

Figure 2. Cr.Cl. (A), UNaV (B), FENa (C), and Na:K (D) of WKY, SHR, SHR + NaHS, SHR + Tempol, and SHR + NaHS + Tempol. The values are mean ± SEM (n = 6). Statistical analysis was done by a repeated measure one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test in respective days. *p < 0.05 versus WKY; †p < 0.05 versus SHR; δp < 0.05 versus SHR + NaHS; #p < 0.05 versus SHR + Tempol. Note: Cr.Cl., creatinine clearance; UNaV, absolute urinary sodium excretion; FENa, fractional sodium excretion; Na:K, urinary sodium potassium ratio.

Figure 2. Cr.Cl. (A), UNaV (B), FENa (C), and Na:K (D) of WKY, SHR, SHR + NaHS, SHR + Tempol, and SHR + NaHS + Tempol. The values are mean ± SEM (n = 6). Statistical analysis was done by a repeated measure one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test in respective days. *p < 0.05 versus WKY; †p < 0.05 versus SHR; δp < 0.05 versus SHR + NaHS; #p < 0.05 versus SHR + Tempol. Note: Cr.Cl., creatinine clearance; UNaV, absolute urinary sodium excretion; FENa, fractional sodium excretion; Na:K, urinary sodium potassium ratio.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.