Publication Cover
Stress
The International Journal on the Biology of Stress
Volume 16, 2013 - Issue 5
411
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Experience-dependent effects of context and restraint stress on corticolimbic c-Fos expression

, , , , &
Pages 587-591 | Received 07 Jan 2013, Accepted 23 Apr 2013, Published online: 20 Jun 2013

Figures & data

Figure 1. Experimental timeline. Pair-housed rats were transported in their home cage to a novel context in which they were restrained (R) or left undisturbed in the context (C) for 6 h, then returned to the colony. The next day, rats again were transported to the previous day’s context and either restrained or left undisturbed, yielding four groups (first and second letter represent conditions on days 1 and 2, respectively; CC, CR, RC, RR). All groups were euthanized 90 min after placement in condition on day 2 for tissue processing.

Figure 1. Experimental timeline. Pair-housed rats were transported in their home cage to a novel context in which they were restrained (R) or left undisturbed in the context (C) for 6 h, then returned to the colony. The next day, rats again were transported to the previous day’s context and either restrained or left undisturbed, yielding four groups (first and second letter represent conditions on days 1 and 2, respectively; CC, CR, RC, RR). All groups were euthanized 90 min after placement in condition on day 2 for tissue processing.

Figure 2. Fos-IR labeling in hippocampus. (A) Regardless of day 1 experience, groups placed in context and not restrained on day 2 (CC, RC) showed elevated Fos-IR labeling in CA1 and CA3 of the hippocampus compared to those restrained on day 2 (***p < 0.001 versus CR, RR in CA1; ***p < 0.001 versus CR, RR in CA3). By contrast, groups that were restrained on day 2 (CR, RR) exhibited greater Fos-IR labeling in the infrapyramidal blade of the dentate gyrus (DGInf) compared to those that were placed in the context but not restrained (§p < 0.05 versus CC, RC; n = 6–8/group). (B) Representative photomicrographs of Fos immunolabeling across groups in the selected subregions of the hippocampus. Scale bar: 100 μm.

Figure 2. Fos-IR labeling in hippocampus. (A) Regardless of day 1 experience, groups placed in context and not restrained on day 2 (CC, RC) showed elevated Fos-IR labeling in CA1 and CA3 of the hippocampus compared to those restrained on day 2 (***p < 0.001 versus CR, RR in CA1; ***p < 0.001 versus CR, RR in CA3). By contrast, groups that were restrained on day 2 (CR, RR) exhibited greater Fos-IR labeling in the infrapyramidal blade of the dentate gyrus (DGInf) compared to those that were placed in the context but not restrained (§p < 0.05 versus CC, RC; n = 6–8/group). (B) Representative photomicrographs of Fos immunolabeling across groups in the selected subregions of the hippocampus. Scale bar: 100 μm.

Figure 3. Fos-IR labeling in amygdala and mPFC. (A) Groups that were placed in a novel context but not restrained on day 2 exhibited elevated Fos expression in BLA and CEA compared to those that were restrained (**p < 0.01 versus CR, RR in BLA; ***p = 0.001 versus CR, RR in CEA; n = 5–8/group). (B) Restraint and context conditions altered Fos labeling within the IL without significantly affecting the PL or the ACG. Specifically, rats placed in the previous day’s restraint context (RC) but not restrained showed elevated Fos-IR labeling within the IL compared to those that were never restrained (#p < 0.05 versus CC). Rats that were acutely restrained (CR) also exhibited greater Fos-IR labeling compared to those that were never restrained (##p < 0.01 versus CC; n = 3–8/group).

Figure 3. Fos-IR labeling in amygdala and mPFC. (A) Groups that were placed in a novel context but not restrained on day 2 exhibited elevated Fos expression in BLA and CEA compared to those that were restrained (**p < 0.01 versus CR, RR in BLA; ***p = 0.001 versus CR, RR in CEA; n = 5–8/group). (B) Restraint and context conditions altered Fos labeling within the IL without significantly affecting the PL or the ACG. Specifically, rats placed in the previous day’s restraint context (RC) but not restrained showed elevated Fos-IR labeling within the IL compared to those that were never restrained (#p < 0.05 versus CC). Rats that were acutely restrained (CR) also exhibited greater Fos-IR labeling compared to those that were never restrained (##p < 0.01 versus CC; n = 3–8/group).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.