938
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Comparative study on the predictability of statistical models (RSM and ANN) on the behavior of optimized buccoadhesive wafers containing Loratadine and their in vivo assessment

, , &
Pages 1016-1027 | Received 29 Mar 2014, Accepted 31 May 2014, Published online: 03 Jul 2014

Figures & data

Table 1. The 32 factorial design matrix (independent variables and their coded and actual levels; and the experimental results of responses(dependable variables) and other physicochemical characteristics of experimentally designed wafers.

Table 2. Experimental (OBS) and predicted values of ANN and RSM for chosen responses.

Figure 1. SEM photograph of the experimentally developed wafers.

Figure 1. SEM photograph of the experimentally developed wafers.

Figure 2. Cumulative % drug release versus time plot of wafers coded as FNA.

Figure 2. Cumulative % drug release versus time plot of wafers coded as FNA.

Table 3. Results obtained by fitting the experimental drug release data to the Korsmeyer–Peppas kinetic equation.

Figure 3. ANN MLP network architecture.

Figure 3. ANN MLP network architecture.

Figure 4. Plot of experimental data against predicted data given by ANN model for (a) disintegration time (b) % swelling index.

Figure 4. Plot of experimental data against predicted data given by ANN model for (a) disintegration time (b) % swelling index.

Figure 5. [a–d] Surface plots obtained from optimization of pharmaceutical wafers using ANN.

Figure 5. [a–d] Surface plots obtained from optimization of pharmaceutical wafers using ANN.

Figure 6. (a), (b), (c) and (d) show images of optimized drug-loaded wafers during contact angle measurement at different time points.

Figure 6. (a), (b), (c) and (d) show images of optimized drug-loaded wafers during contact angle measurement at different time points.

Figure 7. Plot of time versus SFE during contact angle measurement of the optimized wafer.

Figure 7. Plot of time versus SFE during contact angle measurement of the optimized wafer.

Figure 8. HPLC chromatograms obtain during pharmacokinetic study.

Figure 8. HPLC chromatograms obtain during pharmacokinetic study.

Figure 9. Plasma drug concentration versus time profile of Loratadine in rabbit plasma after administration of drug solution and optimized wafer orally.

Figure 9. Plasma drug concentration versus time profile of Loratadine in rabbit plasma after administration of drug solution and optimized wafer orally.

Table 4. Pharmacokinetic parameters of optimized buccoadhesive wafer (shown as Mean, n = 3).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.