Figures & data
Figure 1. Drug solubility in various vehicles. (1) Capryol™ PGMC, (2) Capryol™ 90, (3) Lauroglycol-FCC, (4) castor oil, (5) Labrafil M1944CS, (6) Labrafil M2125 CS, and (7) Peceol. Data represent the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
![Figure 1. Drug solubility in various vehicles. (1) Capryol™ PGMC, (2) Capryol™ 90, (3) Lauroglycol-FCC, (4) castor oil, (5) Labrafil M1944CS, (6) Labrafil M2125 CS, and (7) Peceol. Data represent the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).](/cms/asset/62fea4c1-91a0-4dfd-88dc-896a4515f008/idrd_a_991432_f0001_b.jpg)
Figure 2. Effect of compositions on formulation parameters: particle size, polydispersity index (PDI), and zeta potential (ZP). (A) Liquid lipid concentration, (B) lipid concentration, (C) Tween 80 concentration, (D) drug concentration. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
![Figure 2. Effect of compositions on formulation parameters: particle size, polydispersity index (PDI), and zeta potential (ZP). (A) Liquid lipid concentration, (B) lipid concentration, (C) Tween 80 concentration, (D) drug concentration. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).](/cms/asset/72a655b6-16c0-4837-b75f-aa4cbfd2a76e/idrd_a_991432_f0002_b.jpg)
Table 1. Compositions of VRS-NLCs.
Figure 3. Drug entrapment efficiency and loading capacity.Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
![Figure 3. Drug entrapment efficiency and loading capacity.Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).](/cms/asset/0c575e39-b95e-4a93-8aef-356ed4d11bf7/idrd_a_991432_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 5. (A) Differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) thermograms and (B) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of solid lipid, free VRS, and VRS-NLCs.
![Figure 5. (A) Differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) thermograms and (B) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of solid lipid, free VRS, and VRS-NLCs.](/cms/asset/777b66d4-579c-4358-8c3c-d033da0628f0/idrd_a_991432_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6. In vitro drug release from VRS-NLCs under different conditions: pH 1.2 (Δ) and pH 6.8 (•).
![Figure 6. In vitro drug release from VRS-NLCs under different conditions: pH 1.2 (Δ) and pH 6.8 (•).](/cms/asset/f7ee2df1-d0b7-4a98-a90e-7aa0bfb973a6/idrd_a_991432_f0006_b.jpg)
Figure 7. Intracellular uptake of NLCs in (A) SCC-7 cell, and (B) MCF-7 cells. NLCs contain NBD-PC (green) as a fluorescent probe. The LysoTracker Red stained for lysosome (red).
![Figure 7. Intracellular uptake of NLCs in (A) SCC-7 cell, and (B) MCF-7 cells. NLCs contain NBD-PC (green) as a fluorescent probe. The LysoTracker Red stained for lysosome (red).](/cms/asset/fc7c307f-deb6-43ed-8a94-171ef126c468/idrd_a_991432_f0007_c.jpg)
Figure 8. Cell viability following exposure of MCF-7, A549, and SCC-7 cells to blank NLCs, free VRS, and VRS-NLCs for 24 h. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 8).
![Figure 8. Cell viability following exposure of MCF-7, A549, and SCC-7 cells to blank NLCs, free VRS, and VRS-NLCs for 24 h. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 8).](/cms/asset/441c4619-8bc3-4d9f-b38e-1e683cbd11a1/idrd_a_991432_f0008_b.jpg)
Figure 9. Plasma concentration-time profile of VRS after oral administration at a dose of 30 mg/kg of free VRS (□) or VRS-NLCs (▪). Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 4).
![Figure 9. Plasma concentration-time profile of VRS after oral administration at a dose of 30 mg/kg of free VRS (□) or VRS-NLCs (▪). Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 4).](/cms/asset/fa9b62dd-a6a5-4906-8b1a-f1dd9ed05be4/idrd_a_991432_f0009_b.jpg)