2,092
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Transdermal delivery of vancomycin hydrochloride using combination of nano-ethosomes and iontophoresis: in vitro and in vivo study

, , , , &
Pages 1558-1564 | Received 29 Dec 2014, Accepted 26 Jan 2015, Published online: 02 Mar 2015

Figures & data

Table 1. Composition of ethosomal formulae.

Table 2. The % of vancomycin hydrochloride in ethosomal formulae after continuous exposure for 12 h to 0.5 mA/cm2 current.

Figure 1. Permeation profile of vancomycin hydrochloride from free drug solution and different ethosomal formulae with/without iontophoresis.

Figure 1. Permeation profile of vancomycin hydrochloride from free drug solution and different ethosomal formulae with/without iontophoresis.

Figure 2. Transdermal flux (Jss) of free drug and ethosomal formula at 25 mg/ml drug concentration, 0 mA/cm2, 0.5 mA/cm2 and continuous current density (n = 3, error bars represent S.D. values).

Figure 2. Transdermal flux (Jss) of free drug and ethosomal formula at 25 mg/ml drug concentration, 0 mA/cm2, 0.5 mA/cm2 and continuous current density (n = 3, error bars represent S.D. values).

Table 3. Permeation parameters of vancomycin hydrochloride as free drug and from ethosomal formulae combined with iontophoresis at 0 and 0.5 mA/cm2 current.

Figure 3. Effect of current mode on transdermal flux of F2 at same experimental conditions (n = 3, error bars represent S.D. values).

Figure 3. Effect of current mode on transdermal flux of F2 at same experimental conditions (n = 3, error bars represent S.D. values).

Figure 4. Effect of current density on transdermal flux of F2 at same experimental conditions (n = 3, error bars represent S.D. values).

Figure 4. Effect of current density on transdermal flux of F2 at same experimental conditions (n = 3, error bars represent S.D. values).

Figure 5. Effect of concentration on transdermal flux of F2 at same experimental conditions (n = 3, error bars represent S.D. values).

Figure 5. Effect of concentration on transdermal flux of F2 at same experimental conditions (n = 3, error bars represent S.D. values).

Figure 6. Effect of drug solvent on transdermal flux of F2 at same experimental conditions (n = 3, error bars represent S.D. values).

Figure 6. Effect of drug solvent on transdermal flux of F2 at same experimental conditions (n = 3, error bars represent S.D. values).

Figure 7. Mean bacterial count of rat groups (n = 6, error bars represent S.D. values).

Figure 7. Mean bacterial count of rat groups (n = 6, error bars represent S.D. values).

Table 4. Mean bacterial count of four groups.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.