3,817
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A smart tumor targeting peptide–drug conjugate, pHLIP-SS-DOX: synthesis and cellular uptake on MCF-7 and MCF-7/Adr cells

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 1734-1746 | Received 28 Jan 2015, Accepted 09 Mar 2015, Published online: 08 Apr 2015

Figures & data

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the delivery of drugs into a cell. At physiological pH, the peptide–drug conjugates interact weakly with a membrane. At low pH, the peptide forms a transmembrane helix with its C-terminus inserted in the cytoplasm, the intracellular reductive environment breaks the disulfide bond to release the drug.

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the delivery of drugs into a cell. At physiological pH, the peptide–drug conjugates interact weakly with a membrane. At low pH, the peptide forms a transmembrane helix with its C-terminus inserted in the cytoplasm, the intracellular reductive environment breaks the disulfide bond to release the drug.

Figure 2. Characteristics of Py-SS-DOX. 1H NMR spectra (A) and HPLC spectra (B) of DOX·HCl, Py-SS-COOH, Py-SS-DOX. ESI/MS spectrum (C) and FTIR spectrum (D) of Py-SS-DOX.

Figure 2. Characteristics of Py-SS-DOX. 1H NMR spectra (A) and HPLC spectra (B) of DOX·HCl, Py-SS-COOH, Py-SS-DOX. ESI/MS spectrum (C) and FTIR spectrum (D) of Py-SS-DOX.

Scheme 1. Synthetic routes. Reagents and conditions: (i) Ethanol/AcOH, rt, 2–3 h; (ii) DMF, HBTU, DIEA, rt, 12 h; (iii) DMF, rt, 48 h.

Scheme 1. Synthetic routes. Reagents and conditions: (i) Ethanol/AcOH, rt, 2–3 h; (ii) DMF, HBTU, DIEA, rt, 12 h; (iii) DMF, rt, 48 h.

Figure 3. Characteristics of pHLIP-SS-DOX and DOX-SS-DOX. (A) MALDI-TOF spectra of pHLIP, pHLIP-SS-DOX, (B) HPLC spectra of Py-SS-DOX, pHLIP, pHLIP-SS-DOX, (C) UV spectra of DOX, pHLIP-SS-DOX. And (D) ESI/MS spectrum of DOX-SS-DOX.

Figure 3. Characteristics of pHLIP-SS-DOX and DOX-SS-DOX. (A) MALDI-TOF spectra of pHLIP, pHLIP-SS-DOX, (B) HPLC spectra of Py-SS-DOX, pHLIP, pHLIP-SS-DOX, (C) UV spectra of DOX, pHLIP-SS-DOX. And (D) ESI/MS spectrum of DOX-SS-DOX.

Figure 4. Verification of pHLIP's property. Trp fluorescence (A) and CD (B) spectra of pHLIP. Blue line represents fluorescence and CD spectra of pHLIP at pH 8.0 in the absence of liposomes; red, after 30 min of incubation with liposomes at pH 8.0; purple, after incubation with liposomes at pH 4.0. (C) was the interactions between FITC-pHLIP and MCF cells at different conditions for 3 h. Left, pH=7.4; right, pH=6.0.

Figure 4. Verification of pHLIP's property. Trp fluorescence (A) and CD (B) spectra of pHLIP. Blue line represents fluorescence and CD spectra of pHLIP at pH 8.0 in the absence of liposomes; red, after 30 min of incubation with liposomes at pH 8.0; purple, after incubation with liposomes at pH 4.0. (C) was the interactions between FITC-pHLIP and MCF cells at different conditions for 3 h. Left, pH=7.4; right, pH=6.0.

Figure 5. LDH tests of pHLIP-SS-DOX at different pH conditions on MCF-7 cells for 3 h (A) and in vitro flow cytometry analysis of the uptake of DOX, pHLIP-SS-DOX, Py-SS-DOX, DOX-SH on MCF-7 (B) and MCF-7/Adr (C) cells for 3 h. The concentrations of the conjugates are all 7 μM. *p < 0.05 uptake at pH 6.0 versus uptake at pH 7.4, ***p < 0.001 uptake at pH 6.0 versus uptake at pH 7.4.

Figure 5. LDH tests of pHLIP-SS-DOX at different pH conditions on MCF-7 cells for 3 h (A) and in vitro flow cytometry analysis of the uptake of DOX, pHLIP-SS-DOX, Py-SS-DOX, DOX-SH on MCF-7 (B) and MCF-7/Adr (C) cells for 3 h. The concentrations of the conjugates are all 7 μM. *p < 0.05 uptake at pH 6.0 versus uptake at pH 7.4, ***p < 0.001 uptake at pH 6.0 versus uptake at pH 7.4.

Figure 6. Laser scanning confocal analysis of the uptake of DOX, pHLIP-SS-DOX, Py-SS-DOX, DOX-SH on MCF-7 cells (A, B) and MCF-7/Adr (C, D) cells at pH 7.4 (A, C) or pH 6.0 (B, D) for 3 h. The concentrations the conjugates are all 7 μM.

Figure 6. Laser scanning confocal analysis of the uptake of DOX, pHLIP-SS-DOX, Py-SS-DOX, DOX-SH on MCF-7 cells (A, B) and MCF-7/Adr (C, D) cells at pH 7.4 (A, C) or pH 6.0 (B, D) for 3 h. The concentrations the conjugates are all 7 μM.

Figure 7. GSH-OEt mediated cytotoxicity against MCF-7 cells after incubation with pHLIP-SS-DOX. Cells were treated with 10 mM GSH-OEt for 2 h before the following treatment with pHLIP-SS-DOX for 48 h or 72 h at pH 7.4 or pH 6.0. **p < 0.01 cell viability without GSH-OEt versus cell viability with GSH-OEt, ***p < 0.001 cell viability without GSH-OEt versus cell viability without GSH-OEt.

Figure 7. GSH-OEt mediated cytotoxicity against MCF-7 cells after incubation with pHLIP-SS-DOX. Cells were treated with 10 mM GSH-OEt for 2 h before the following treatment with pHLIP-SS-DOX for 48 h or 72 h at pH 7.4 or pH 6.0. **p < 0.01 cell viability without GSH-OEt versus cell viability with GSH-OEt, ***p < 0.001 cell viability without GSH-OEt versus cell viability without GSH-OEt.
Supplemental material

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.