5,983
Views
87
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Induction of HIV-1 gag specific immune responses by cationic micelles mediated delivery of gag mRNA

, , , &
Pages 2596-2607 | Received 05 Feb 2015, Accepted 05 Apr 2015, Published online: 29 May 2015

Figures & data

Figure 1. Schematic representation of how PSA micelles loaded with mRNA was delivered to APCs. PSA/mRNA nanoparticles were hypothesized to translate into protein, thus can lead to CD4+ and CD8+ T cell response. Gag mRNA alone can also induce immune response by interaction with the TLRs.

Figure 1. Schematic representation of how PSA micelles loaded with mRNA was delivered to APCs. PSA/mRNA nanoparticles were hypothesized to translate into protein, thus can lead to CD4+ and CD8+ T cell response. Gag mRNA alone can also induce immune response by interaction with the TLRs.

Figure 2. (A) Schematic representation of pVAX1-gag used in the study. The in vitro transcription template contained human β-globin-specific 5′ and 3′ UTRs and a 30 nucleotide-long poly A tail. The start (AUG) and stop (UAA) codons were added. (B) Detection of mRNAs. In vitro transcripts were tested in 4% nuclease-free agarose gel. The position and size of the mRNAs were indicated. (C) Gel retardation assay of PSA/mRNA polyplexes in 4% nuclease-free agarose gel. Polyplexes were prepared at different weight to weight ratio of PSA/mRNA. Naked mRNA was the control without any complexation.

Figure 2. (A) Schematic representation of pVAX1-gag used in the study. The in vitro transcription template contained human β-globin-specific 5′ and 3′ UTRs and a 30 nucleotide-long poly A tail. The start (AUG) and stop (UAA) codons were added. (B) Detection of mRNAs. In vitro transcripts were tested in 4% nuclease-free agarose gel. The position and size of the mRNAs were indicated. (C) Gel retardation assay of PSA/mRNA polyplexes in 4% nuclease-free agarose gel. Polyplexes were prepared at different weight to weight ratio of PSA/mRNA. Naked mRNA was the control without any complexation.

Figure 3. Morphology and size distribution of PSA and PSA/mRNA nanoparticles were evaluated at PSA:mRNA (W/W)ratio of 4. (A) Size and distribution of PSA/mRNA nanoparticles by intensity. TEM image of (B) naked PSA and (C) PSA/mRNA nanoparticles (1% phosphotungstic acid-negative staining).

Figure 3. Morphology and size distribution of PSA and PSA/mRNA nanoparticles were evaluated at PSA:mRNA (W/W)ratio of 4. (A) Size and distribution of PSA/mRNA nanoparticles by intensity. TEM image of (B) naked PSA and (C) PSA/mRNA nanoparticles (1% phosphotungstic acid-negative staining).

Figure 4. Cytotoxicity and cell uptake of PSA/mRNA nanoparticles. (A) Cell viability of PEI polymers was determined on DC2.4 cells. Untreated cells were defined as 100% viability cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3), **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005. (B) Flow cytometry analysis for cell uptake efficiency of Fl-mRNA complexed with PEI-2k, PSA or PEI-25k at the indicated mass ratio after incubation with DC2.4 cells for 2 h. (Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3). ***p < 0.005) (C) Confocal laser scanning microscopy showed the endosome escape of PSA/Fl-mRNA nanoparticles. DC2.4 cells were incubated with Fl-mRNA complexed with PSA for the indicated times. Green fluorescence was Fl-mRNA and red fluorescence was endosome stained with Lyso-tracker, yellow fluorescence was the co-localization site of the Fl-mRNA and endosome.

Figure 4. Cytotoxicity and cell uptake of PSA/mRNA nanoparticles. (A) Cell viability of PEI polymers was determined on DC2.4 cells. Untreated cells were defined as 100% viability cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3), **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005. (B) Flow cytometry analysis for cell uptake efficiency of Fl-mRNA complexed with PEI-2k, PSA or PEI-25k at the indicated mass ratio after incubation with DC2.4 cells for 2 h. (Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3). ***p < 0.005) (C) Confocal laser scanning microscopy showed the endosome escape of PSA/Fl-mRNA nanoparticles. DC2.4 cells were incubated with Fl-mRNA complexed with PSA for the indicated times. Green fluorescence was Fl-mRNA and red fluorescence was endosome stained with Lyso-tracker, yellow fluorescence was the co-localization site of the Fl-mRNA and endosome.

Figure 5. DC2.4 cells after transfection with (A) PEI-25k/mEGFP W/W=4, (B) PSA/mEGFP W/W=4 and (C) naked mEGFP. (D) Transfection efficiency of naked mGag and the indicated PEI complexes. Transfection efficiency of cells treated with PSA/mEGFP was consistently significantly higher as compared to that of PEI-2k/mEGFP at the indicated mass ratio. (Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3). ***p < 0.005).

Figure 5. DC2.4 cells after transfection with (A) PEI-25k/mEGFP W/W=4, (B) PSA/mEGFP W/W=4 and (C) naked mEGFP. (D) Transfection efficiency of naked mGag and the indicated PEI complexes. Transfection efficiency of cells treated with PSA/mEGFP was consistently significantly higher as compared to that of PEI-2k/mEGFP at the indicated mass ratio. (Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3). ***p < 0.005).

Figure 6. Expression level of co-stimulatory surface markers (CD80 and CD86) in BMDCs treated with naked mRNA alone and complexes. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3), *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.005.

Figure 6. Expression level of co-stimulatory surface markers (CD80 and CD86) in BMDCs treated with naked mRNA alone and complexes. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3), *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.005.

Figure 7. Serum levels of IgG, IgG1 and IgG2a after immunization. Sera from PEI/mGag complexes and naked gag mRNA immunized mice were collected post-immunization. The serum levels of (A) IgG (B) IgG1 and IgG2a antibodies were assayed by ELISA. Both the IgG1 and IgG2a levels in PSA/mGag immunized mice were significantly higher than that of PSA/mRandom, gag mRNA alone and PEI-2k/mGag group (p < 0.05). Data were represented as mean ± SD values (n = 3), *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.005.

Figure 7. Serum levels of IgG, IgG1 and IgG2a after immunization. Sera from PEI/mGag complexes and naked gag mRNA immunized mice were collected post-immunization. The serum levels of (A) IgG (B) IgG1 and IgG2a antibodies were assayed by ELISA. Both the IgG1 and IgG2a levels in PSA/mGag immunized mice were significantly higher than that of PSA/mRandom, gag mRNA alone and PEI-2k/mGag group (p < 0.05). Data were represented as mean ± SD values (n = 3), *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.005.

Figure 8. Intracellular cytokine staining of splenocytes after immunized with naked gag mRNA and different PEI/mGag complexes. (A) The CD8+/IFN-γ+ staining, (B) the CD4+/IL-4+ staining, the double-positive percentage of (C) CD8+/IFN-γ+ and (D) CD4+/IL-4+. Data were shown as mean ± SD (n = 3), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005.

Figure 8. Intracellular cytokine staining of splenocytes after immunized with naked gag mRNA and different PEI/mGag complexes. (A) The CD8+/IFN-γ+ staining, (B) the CD4+/IL-4+ staining, the double-positive percentage of (C) CD8+/IFN-γ+ and (D) CD4+/IL-4+. Data were shown as mean ± SD (n = 3), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005.

Figure 9. Cytokine production of mice immunized with naked gag mRNA and different complexes. (A) IFN-γ levels in splenocytes supernatants. (B) IL-4 levels in splenocytes supernatants. Data were shown as mean ± SD (n = 4), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005.

Figure 9. Cytokine production of mice immunized with naked gag mRNA and different complexes. (A) IFN-γ levels in splenocytes supernatants. (B) IL-4 levels in splenocytes supernatants. Data were shown as mean ± SD (n = 4), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.