3,718
Views
53
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Formulation and evaluation of novel glycyrrhizic acid micelles for transdermal delivery of podophyllotoxin

, , , , , & show all
Pages 1623-1635 | Received 07 Oct 2015, Accepted 20 Dec 2015, Published online: 20 Jan 2016

Figures & data

Figure 1. Structure diagram of glycyrrhizic acid.

Figure 1. Structure diagram of glycyrrhizic acid.

Figure 2. The HPLC graphs of POD standard (A), POD-loaded GA micelles formulation (B), the sample from the in vitro skin permeation study (C), and the sample from skin deposition study (D).

Figure 2. The HPLC graphs of POD standard (A), POD-loaded GA micelles formulation (B), the sample from the in vitro skin permeation study (C), and the sample from skin deposition study (D).

Figure 3. (A) Phase-solubility diagram of the POD solution at different ethanol–water ratios (0%, 10%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, and 40%); (B) influence of the GA/POD ratios and ethanol contents (0%, 15%, 20%, 25%, and 30%) on the solubility of POD. (C) Influence of different GA/POD ratios on the encapsulation efficiency of POD as the ethanol content was set at 25% (v/v); Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3).

Figure 3. (A) Phase-solubility diagram of the POD solution at different ethanol–water ratios (0%, 10%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, and 40%); (B) influence of the GA/POD ratios and ethanol contents (0%, 15%, 20%, 25%, and 30%) on the solubility of POD. (C) Influence of different GA/POD ratios on the encapsulation efficiency of POD as the ethanol content was set at 25% (v/v); Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3).

Figure 4. DSC thermograms of the pure POD, pure GA, POD, and GA physical complexes and POD-loaded GA micelles.

Figure 4. DSC thermograms of the pure POD, pure GA, POD, and GA physical complexes and POD-loaded GA micelles.

Figure 5. The CMC of GA in the ethanol–water solution in contents of zero percent (A), 15% (B), 25% (C), 35% (D), and 55% (E); Change of the CMC in different ethanol levels (F).

Figure 5. The CMC of GA in the ethanol–water solution in contents of zero percent (A), 15% (B), 25% (C), 35% (D), and 55% (E); Change of the CMC in different ethanol levels (F).

Figure 6. Dynamic light scattering results of the POD-loaded GA micelles (A) and blank micelles (B); TEM images of the POD-loaded GA micelles preparation (×20 k and ×50 k) (C).

Figure 6. Dynamic light scattering results of the POD-loaded GA micelles (A) and blank micelles (B); TEM images of the POD-loaded GA micelles preparation (×20 k and ×50 k) (C).

Table 1. The characteristic parameters of the POD-loaded GA micelles.

Figure 7. (A) In vitro skin permeation studies of the skin applied with POD tincture, POD-loaded GA micelles preparation, and POD tincture (included GA). The POD concentration of these samples was 5 mg/mL (n = 5); (B) In vitro release profiles of the POD-loaded GA micelles in PBS at 37 ± 0.5 °C (n = 3); (C) In vivo drug-deposition studies of the skin applied with the POD-loaded GA micelles preparation (5 mg/mL) and the POD tincture of different drug concentrations (1, 3, and 5 mg/mL); fluorescent images of the rat skin treated with the GA solution (D), POD tincture (E), and POD-loaded GA micelles preparation (F).

Figure 7. (A) In vitro skin permeation studies of the skin applied with POD tincture, POD-loaded GA micelles preparation, and POD tincture (included GA). The POD concentration of these samples was 5 mg/mL (n = 5); (B) In vitro release profiles of the POD-loaded GA micelles in PBS at 37 ± 0.5 °C (n = 3); (C) In vivo drug-deposition studies of the skin applied with the POD-loaded GA micelles preparation (5 mg/mL) and the POD tincture of different drug concentrations (1, 3, and 5 mg/mL); fluorescent images of the rat skin treated with the GA solution (D), POD tincture (E), and POD-loaded GA micelles preparation (F).

Table 2. The in vitro skin permeation study.

Table 3. The amount of drug deposited in skin (μg/cm2).

Figure 8. HE-staining graphs showing the histological changes of the skin; the immunohistochemical photograph showing the difference between the skin groups treated with physiological saline, 75% ethanol, POD tincture, and POD-loaded GA micelles formulation (magnification,  ×200).

Figure 8. HE-staining graphs showing the histological changes of the skin; the immunohistochemical photograph showing the difference between the skin groups treated with physiological saline, 75% ethanol, POD tincture, and POD-loaded GA micelles formulation (magnification,  ×200).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.