Figures & data
Figure 2. The HPLC graphs of POD standard (A), POD-loaded GA micelles formulation (B), the sample from the in vitro skin permeation study (C), and the sample from skin deposition study (D).
![Figure 2. The HPLC graphs of POD standard (A), POD-loaded GA micelles formulation (B), the sample from the in vitro skin permeation study (C), and the sample from skin deposition study (D).](/cms/asset/d7b5a45c-858f-44a1-bff1-1307397cc519/idrd_a_1135489_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3. (A) Phase-solubility diagram of the POD solution at different ethanol–water ratios (0%, 10%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, and 40%); (B) influence of the GA/POD ratios and ethanol contents (0%, 15%, 20%, 25%, and 30%) on the solubility of POD. (C) Influence of different GA/POD ratios on the encapsulation efficiency of POD as the ethanol content was set at 25% (v/v); Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3).
![Figure 3. (A) Phase-solubility diagram of the POD solution at different ethanol–water ratios (0%, 10%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, and 40%); (B) influence of the GA/POD ratios and ethanol contents (0%, 15%, 20%, 25%, and 30%) on the solubility of POD. (C) Influence of different GA/POD ratios on the encapsulation efficiency of POD as the ethanol content was set at 25% (v/v); Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3).](/cms/asset/b95ea947-6fcb-4537-a4f1-ada0689b8fb7/idrd_a_1135489_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4. DSC thermograms of the pure POD, pure GA, POD, and GA physical complexes and POD-loaded GA micelles.
![Figure 4. DSC thermograms of the pure POD, pure GA, POD, and GA physical complexes and POD-loaded GA micelles.](/cms/asset/db94394e-aa20-4318-b5b9-5b639b41c11c/idrd_a_1135489_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5. The CMC of GA in the ethanol–water solution in contents of zero percent (A), 15% (B), 25% (C), 35% (D), and 55% (E); Change of the CMC in different ethanol levels (F).
![Figure 5. The CMC of GA in the ethanol–water solution in contents of zero percent (A), 15% (B), 25% (C), 35% (D), and 55% (E); Change of the CMC in different ethanol levels (F).](/cms/asset/50fa6a92-b259-4683-b503-e824167c6e3b/idrd_a_1135489_f0005_b.jpg)
Figure 6. Dynamic light scattering results of the POD-loaded GA micelles (A) and blank micelles (B); TEM images of the POD-loaded GA micelles preparation (×20 k and ×50 k) (C).
![Figure 6. Dynamic light scattering results of the POD-loaded GA micelles (A) and blank micelles (B); TEM images of the POD-loaded GA micelles preparation (×20 k and ×50 k) (C).](/cms/asset/75cb3591-196a-49b5-b0c0-0c7eebb9751a/idrd_a_1135489_f0006_c.jpg)
Table 1. The characteristic parameters of the POD-loaded GA micelles.
Figure 7. (A) In vitro skin permeation studies of the skin applied with POD tincture, POD-loaded GA micelles preparation, and POD tincture (included GA). The POD concentration of these samples was 5 mg/mL (n = 5); (B) In vitro release profiles of the POD-loaded GA micelles in PBS at 37 ± 0.5 °C (n = 3); (C) In vivo drug-deposition studies of the skin applied with the POD-loaded GA micelles preparation (5 mg/mL) and the POD tincture of different drug concentrations (1, 3, and 5 mg/mL); fluorescent images of the rat skin treated with the GA solution (D), POD tincture (E), and POD-loaded GA micelles preparation (F).
![Figure 7. (A) In vitro skin permeation studies of the skin applied with POD tincture, POD-loaded GA micelles preparation, and POD tincture (included GA). The POD concentration of these samples was 5 mg/mL (n = 5); (B) In vitro release profiles of the POD-loaded GA micelles in PBS at 37 ± 0.5 °C (n = 3); (C) In vivo drug-deposition studies of the skin applied with the POD-loaded GA micelles preparation (5 mg/mL) and the POD tincture of different drug concentrations (1, 3, and 5 mg/mL); fluorescent images of the rat skin treated with the GA solution (D), POD tincture (E), and POD-loaded GA micelles preparation (F).](/cms/asset/5e54e8a1-cec6-4165-85be-4cb4b413a0b5/idrd_a_1135489_f0007_c.jpg)