22,381
Views
149
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Efficacy of phytoestrogens for menopausal symptoms: a meta-analysis and systematic review

, &
Pages 260-269 | Received 06 Aug 2014, Accepted 12 Sep 2014, Published online: 01 Dec 2014

Figures & data

Figure 1 Flow diagram of study selection

Figure 1 Flow diagram of study selection

Table 1 General characteristics of the 15 studies included in the meta-analysis. Age is presented as mean (standard deviation)

Table 2 Summary of Kupperman index and hot flush frequency reported in the studies included in the meta-analysis. Data are given as mean (standard deviation), except for side-effects which are reported as a number

Figure 2 Meta-analysis (a) with sensitivity evaluation (b) for change in Kupperman index between placebo and phytoestrogen groups (seven studies included). The random-effects approach was used due to significant heterogeneity (Q = 370.03, I2 = 98.38, p < 0.001). CI, confidence interval

Figure 2 Meta-analysis (a) with sensitivity evaluation (b) for change in Kupperman index between placebo and phytoestrogen groups (seven studies included). The random-effects approach was used due to significant heterogeneity (Q = 370.03, I2 = 98.38, p < 0.001). CI, confidence interval

Figure 3 Meta-analysis (a) with sensitivity evaluation (b) for change of hot flush frequency between placebo and phytoestrogen groups (10 studies included). The random-effects approach was used due to significant heterogeneity (Q = 22.75, I2 = 60.43, p = 0.007). CI, confidence interval

Figure 3 Meta-analysis (a) with sensitivity evaluation (b) for change of hot flush frequency between placebo and phytoestrogen groups (10 studies included). The random-effects approach was used due to significant heterogeneity (Q = 22.75, I2 = 60.43, p = 0.007). CI, confidence interval

Figure 4 Meta-analysis (a) with sensitivity evaluation (b) for the likelihood of side-effects between the placebo and phytoestrogen groups (five studies included). The random-effects approach was used due to significant heterogeneity (Q = 10.15, I2 = 60.60, p = 0.038). OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval

Figure 4 Meta-analysis (a) with sensitivity evaluation (b) for the likelihood of side-effects between the placebo and phytoestrogen groups (five studies included). The random-effects approach was used due to significant heterogeneity (Q = 10.15, I2 = 60.60, p = 0.038). OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval

Figure 5 Evaluation of publication bias for (a) Kupperman index, (b) hot flush frequency, and (c) side-effects

Figure 5 Evaluation of publication bias for (a) Kupperman index, (b) hot flush frequency, and (c) side-effects

Figure 6 Quality assessment

Figure 6 Quality assessment