270
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Assessment of sonographer nuchal translucency measurement performance – central tendency and dispersion

, , , , , & show all
Pages 812-816 | Received 15 Apr 2010, Accepted 11 Aug 2010, Published online: 26 Jan 2011
 

Abstract

Objective. To assess center and sonographer nuchal translucency (NT) measurements that were performed as part of routine prenatal screening for Down syndrome.

Methods. Sonographers were assessed for measures of central tendency and dispersion by comparing them with expected population median and dispersion parameters. NT measurements were converted to multiples of the expected NT values according to CRL (NTMoM) and transformed to their log10 equivalent (log10 NTMoM). Central tendency and measurement were assessed by checking whether the median of the NTMoM distribution and SD of the log10 NTMoM distributions were, respectively, within 5% or 10% of the expected median of 1 and SD of 0.1. Assessment was performed using both the Center specific and Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) reference NT for Crown rump length (CRL).

Results. The median NT MoM was 0.95 MoM using the FMF reference and 1.01 MoM when assessed using our center specific reference median. The difference between the center and FMF derived NT MoMs was statistically significantly (p < 0.0001). NTMoM medians increased over time at a rate of 0.0099 MoM per year while log10 NT MoM measurement dispersement was similar to the 0.1 value expected and decreased by 0.0048 per year.

Conclusion. Centers should routinely monitor the quality of NT measurements used to estimate Down syndrome screening risk and should provide individualized feedback to sonographers of their measures of central tendency and dispersion to ensure consistent and improved performance. NT reference medians adopted from other populations should be assessed and validated against a centers own measurement distribution.

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the Fetal Medicine team for their dedication and professionalism in facilitating the performance of this study.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.