2,524
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Development of a squamous cell carcinoma mouse model for immunotoxicity testing

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 226-234 | Received 12 Mar 2015, Accepted 22 Apr 2015, Published online: 22 May 2015

Figures & data

Table 1. Experimental design.

Figure 1. Drug effects on SCC VII cells in vitro. Azathioprine and Prednisone show dose responsive effects on SCC VII cells in vitro at high concentrations. Data shown are mean ± SD. * Cell count was significantly less than control (p < 0.05).

Figure 1. Drug effects on SCC VII cells in vitro. Azathioprine and Prednisone show dose responsive effects on SCC VII cells in vitro at high concentrations. Data shown are mean ± SD. * Cell count was significantly less than control (p < 0.05).

Figure 2. Primary tumor volume increases over time with and without treatment. Data shown are mean ± SD. *At Day 19, Prednisone is significantly less than vehicle control (p < 0.05); n = 12/group. **At Day 24, Prednisone is statistically less than vehicle control and Abatacept is significantly greater than control (p < 0.05); n = 12/group.

Figure 2. Primary tumor volume increases over time with and without treatment. Data shown are mean ± SD. *At Day 19, Prednisone is significantly less than vehicle control (p < 0.05); n = 12/group. **At Day 24, Prednisone is statistically less than vehicle control and Abatacept is significantly greater than control (p < 0.05); n = 12/group.

Figure 3. Fluorescence traffic to popliteal lymph node. Abatacept and Prednisone decrease fluorescence traffic to the popliteal lymph nodes, while Azathioprine, Etanercept and CTX have no effect on traffic. Line at mean ± SD is shown. *Significantly less than vehicle control (p < 0.05); n = 12/group. Treatment group always compared to respective control. Red lymph nodes are positive for growth (histological assessment).

Figure 3. Fluorescence traffic to popliteal lymph node. Abatacept and Prednisone decrease fluorescence traffic to the popliteal lymph nodes, while Azathioprine, Etanercept and CTX have no effect on traffic. Line at mean ± SD is shown. *Significantly less than vehicle control (p < 0.05); n = 12/group. Treatment group always compared to respective control. Red lymph nodes are positive for growth (histological assessment).

Figure 4. Experimental metastases. CTX increases experimental metastases. Line at median. *Significantly less than vehicle control (p < 0.05); n = 12/group. Treatment group always compared back to respective control.

Figure 4. Experimental metastases. CTX increases experimental metastases. Line at median. *Significantly less than vehicle control (p < 0.05); n = 12/group. Treatment group always compared back to respective control.

Figure 5. Representative IHC images of SCC VII cells in lung, (a) IHC for BrdU, (b) IHC for vWF. 20X Magnification.

Figure 5. Representative IHC images of SCC VII cells in lung, (a) IHC for BrdU, (b) IHC for vWF. 20X Magnification.

Figure 6. Lesion area for established lung colonies. Abatacept decreases lesion area in established lung colonies. Box and whiskers, Min to Max. *Significantly different from control (p < 0.05); n = 12/group. Treatment group always compared back to respective control.

Figure 6. Lesion area for established lung colonies. Abatacept decreases lesion area in established lung colonies. Box and whiskers, Min to Max. *Significantly different from control (p < 0.05); n = 12/group. Treatment group always compared back to respective control.

Figure 7. Growth fraction in established colonies. CTX and Azathioprine increase growth fraction in established colonies. Box and whiskers, Min to Max. *Significantly different from control (p < 0.05); n = 12/group. Treatment group always compared back to respective control.

Figure 7. Growth fraction in established colonies. CTX and Azathioprine increase growth fraction in established colonies. Box and whiskers, Min to Max. *Significantly different from control (p < 0.05); n = 12/group. Treatment group always compared back to respective control.

Figure 8. Immunosuppressive drug effects on angiogenesis in established lung colonies. Box and whiskers, Min to Max. *Significantly different from control (p < 0.05); n = 12/group. Treatment group always compared back to respective control.

Figure 8. Immunosuppressive drug effects on angiogenesis in established lung colonies. Box and whiskers, Min to Max. *Significantly different from control (p < 0.05); n = 12/group. Treatment group always compared back to respective control.

Table 2. Immunosuppressive drugs tested had varying effects on models of invasion, colonization and progression: Summary of results.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.