6,762
Views
309
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
NPDS Report 2010

2010 Annual Report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers’ National Poison Data System (NPDS): 28th Annual Report

, MD, FACEP, FACMT, , MD, PHD, , JR, MD, PHD, , PHD, , MD & , MD, PHD
Pages 910-941 | Published online: 14 Dec 2011

Figures & data

Fig. 1. Human Exposure Calls, Information Calls and Animal Exposure Calls by Day since 1 January 2000.

Black lines show least-squares second order regression–both linear and second order (quadratic) terms were statistically significant for each of the 3 regressions. (See colour version of this figure online).

Fig. 1. Human Exposure Calls, Information Calls and Animal Exposure Calls by Day since 1 January 2000.Black lines show least-squares second order regression–both linear and second order (quadratic) terms were statistically significant for each of the 3 regressions. (See colour version of this figure online).

Table 1A. AAPCC Population Served and Reported Exposures (1983–2010)

Table 1B. Non-Human Exposures by Animal Type

Table 1C. Distribution of Information Calls

Fig. 2. All Drug Identification and Law Enforcement Drug Identification Calls by Day since 1 January 2000.

Black line shows least-squares second order regression–both linear and second order (quadratic) terms were statistically significant for the Law Enforcement Drug ID Calls. (See colour version of this figure online).

Fig. 2. All Drug Identification and Law Enforcement Drug Identification Calls by Day since 1 January 2000.Black line shows least-squares second order regression–both linear and second order (quadratic) terms were statistically significant for the Law Enforcement Drug ID Calls. (See colour version of this figure online).

Fig. 3. Health Care Facility (HCF) Exposure Calls and HCF Information Calls by Day since 1 January 2000.

Black lines show least-squares first and second order regressions–linear regression for HCF Exposure Calls (second order term was not statistically significant) and second order regression for HCF Information Calls. All terms shown were statistically significant for each of the 2 regressions. (See colour version of this figure online).

Fig. 3. Health Care Facility (HCF) Exposure Calls and HCF Information Calls by Day since 1 January 2000.Black lines show least-squares first and second order regressions–linear regression for HCF Exposure Calls (second order term was not statistically significant) and second order regression for HCF Information Calls. All terms shown were statistically significant for each of the 2 regressions. (See colour version of this figure online).

Table 2. Site of Call and Site of Exposure, Human Exposure Cases

Table 3A. Age and Gender Distribution of Human Exposures

Table 3B. Population-Adjusted Exposures by Age Group

Table 4. Distribution of Agea and Gender for Fatalitiesb

Table 5. Number of Substances Involved in Human Exposure Cases

Table 6A. Reason for Human Exposure Cases

Table 6B. Scenarios for Therapeutic Errorsa by Ageb

Table 7. Distribution of Reason for Exposure by Age

Table 8. Distribution of Reason for Exposure and Age for Fatalitiesa

Table 9. Route of Exposure for Human Exposure Cases

Table 10. Management Site of Human Exposures

Table 11. Medical Outcome of Human Exposure Cases by Patient Agea

Table 12. Medical Outcome by Reason for Exposure in Human Exposuresa

Table 13. Duration of Clinical Effects by Medical Outcome

Table 14. Decontamination and Therapeutic Interventions

Table 15. Therapy Provided in Human Exposures by Age.

Table 16A. Decontamination Trends (1985–2009)

Table 16B. Decontamination Trends: Total Human and Pediatric Exposures ≤5 Years (2010)a

Table 17A. Substance Categories Most Frequently Involved in Human Exposures (Top 25)

Fig. 4. Change in Encounters from 2009 to 2010 with Graphical Breakdown of Exposure Calls.

The figure shows how the decrease of 94,530 in Human Exposure Calls divides among the 10 Medical Outcomes. The More Serious Exposures (Minor, Moderate, Major and Death) all increased and their combined increase was 22,175 calls (23.5% of the 94,530 total decrease). The Less Serious Exposures (the other 6 outcome groups) decreased by 116,705 (−123.5% of the 94,530 total decrease). (See colour version of this figure online).

Fig. 4. Change in Encounters from 2009 to 2010 with Graphical Breakdown of Exposure Calls.The figure shows how the decrease of 94,530 in Human Exposure Calls divides among the 10 Medical Outcomes. The More Serious Exposures (Minor, Moderate, Major and Death) all increased and their combined increase was 22,175 calls (23.5% of the 94,530 total decrease). The Less Serious Exposures (the other 6 outcome groups) decreased by 116,705 (−123.5% of the 94,530 total decrease). (See colour version of this figure online).

Fig. 5. Gulf Oil Spill Encounters per Day.

Black line for Gulf Oil Spill Encounters (human and animal exposure and information calls) shows a spline smoothing fit (lambda V 0.0000117, rsquare V 0.710). Map shows number of calls per day. (See colour version of this figure online).

Fig. 5. Gulf Oil Spill Encounters per Day.Black line for Gulf Oil Spill Encounters (human and animal exposure and information calls) shows a spline smoothing fit (lambda V 0.0000117, rsquare V 0.710). Map shows number of calls per day. (See colour version of this figure online).

Fig. 6. Emerging Trends: Bath Salts and THC Homologs Exposures.

Black line for Bath Salt Exposures shows a spline smoothing fit (lambda = 0.01, rsquare = 0.829).

Black line for THC Homolog Exposures shows s show least-squares second order regressions: THC Exposures = −26,223 + 13.0*Year −3.83* (Year-2011)ˆ2 (rsquare = 0.708). All 3 terms in this regression were statistically significant (p < 0.05). (See colour version of this figure online).

Fig. 6. Emerging Trends: Bath Salts and THC Homologs Exposures.Black line for Bath Salt Exposures shows a spline smoothing fit (lambda = 0.01, rsquare = 0.829).Black line for THC Homolog Exposures shows s show least-squares second order regressions: THC Exposures = −26,223 + 13.0*Year −3.83* (Year-2011)ˆ2 (rsquare = 0.708). All 3 terms in this regression were statistically significant (p < 0.05). (See colour version of this figure online).

Fig. 7. Human Exposure Calls By Year 2000–2010 – Top 4 Categories.

Solid lines show least-squares linear regressions for the Human Exposure Calls per year for that category (□). Broken lines show 95% confidence interval on the regression. (See colour version of this figure online).

Fig. 7. Human Exposure Calls By Year 2000–2010 – Top 4 Categories.Solid lines show least-squares linear regressions for the Human Exposure Calls per year for that category (□). Broken lines show 95% confidence interval on the regression. (See colour version of this figure online).

Table 17B. Substance Categories with the Greatest Rate of Exposure Increase (Top 25)

Table 17C. Substance Categories Most Frequently Involved in Pediatric (≤5 years) Exposures (Top 25)a

Table 17D. Substance Categories Most Frequently Involved in Adult (≥ 20 years) Exposures (Top 25)a

Table 17E. Substance Categories Most Frequently Involved in Pediatric (≤5 years) Deathsa

Table 17F. Substance Categories Most Frequently Identified in Drug Identification Calls (Top 25)

Table 17G. Substance Categories Most Frequently Involved in Pregnant Exposuresa (Top 25)

Table 18. Categories Associated with Largest Number of Fatalities (Top 25)a

Table 19A. Comparisons of Death Data (1985–2010)a

Table 19B. Comparisons of Direct and Indirect Death Data (2000–2010)a

Table 20. Frequency of Plant Exposures (Top 25)a

Supplemental material

www.informahealthcare.com/ctx/10.3109/15563650.2011.635149

Download PDF (765.1 KB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.