872
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A stature-specific concept for uncemented, primary total hip arthroplasty

10-year results in 155 patients using two stem shapes and modular necks

, , , , &
Pages 126-133 | Received 11 Nov 2008, Accepted 17 Jul 2009, Published online: 10 Feb 2010

Figures & data

Figure 1.  Profemur E dual stem with standard and “plus” version, and several neck options due to modular neck design.

Figure 1.  Profemur E dual stem with standard and “plus” version, and several neck options due to modular neck design.

Table 1.  Diagnoses and demographics of the 173 patients (190 hips)

Figure 2.  Distribution of hips at final follow-up.

Figure 2.  Distribution of hips at final follow-up.

Figure 3.  Kaplan-Meier curves with 95% confidence intervals demonstrate percent survival for different endpoints. 10-year survival with confidence intervals: all revisions, 93.5% (89–98); cup revisions, 93.5% (87–97); stem revisions, 100%; neck revisions, 98.8% (95–100).

Figure 3.  Kaplan-Meier curves with 95% confidence intervals demonstrate percent survival for different endpoints. 10-year survival with confidence intervals: all revisions, 93.5% (89–98); cup revisions, 93.5% (87–97); stem revisions, 100%; neck revisions, 98.8% (95–100).

Table 2.  Summary of clinical results

Figure 4.  Localization and incidence of femoral radiolucent lines, femoral osteolysis, and cortical hypertrophy.

Figure 4.  Localization and incidence of femoral radiolucent lines, femoral osteolysis, and cortical hypertrophy.

Table 3.  Radiolucent lines and osteolysis of the two different acetabular components