1,229
Views
67
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Poor outcome of revised resurfacing hip arthroplasty

397 cases from the Australian Joint Replacement Registry

, , , , &
Pages 72-76 | Received 02 Nov 2009, Accepted 12 Dec 2009, Published online: 22 Feb 2010

Figures & data

Table 1.  Revision rates for primary resurfacing hip arthroplasty

Table 2.  Revision diagnosis for primary resurfacing hip arthroplasty by type of revision (excluding infection from revision of primary)

Table 3.  Revision rates for revised primary resurfacing hip arthroplasty, by type of revision (excluding infection from revision of primary)

Table 4.  Re-revision diagnosis for revised primary resurfacing hip arthroplasty, by type of revision (excluding infection from revision of primary)

Figure 1.  Cumulative percent revision of revised primary resurfacing hip arthroplasty, by type of revision (excluding infection from revision of primary).

Figure 1.  Cumulative percent revision of revised primary resurfacing hip arthroplasty, by type of revision (excluding infection from revision of primary).

Figure 2.  Cumulative percent revision of primary conventional total hip arthroplasty and femoral-only revision of primary resurfacing hip arthroplasty (excluding primary diagnosis of fractured neck of femur and also excluding infection from revision of primary).

Figure 2.  Cumulative percent revision of primary conventional total hip arthroplasty and femoral-only revision of primary resurfacing hip arthroplasty (excluding primary diagnosis of fractured neck of femur and also excluding infection from revision of primary).