1,312
Views
58
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Improved results of primary total hip replacement

Results from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 1987–2007

, , , &
Pages 649-659 | Received 03 Feb 2010, Accepted 08 Jun 2010, Published online: 26 Nov 2010

Figures & data

Table 1. Age, sex, and diagnosis at primary surgery in 4 time periods

Table 2. The most commonly used implants, in 4 time periods

Table 3. Fixation method for 4 time periods

Figure 1. Number of hips inserted using Simplex, Palacos, or cement types resembling Palacos (green), in 4 time periods. Blue represents other cement types.

Figure 1. Number of hips inserted using Simplex, Palacos, or cement types resembling Palacos (green), in 4 time periods. Blue represents other cement types.

Table 4. Numbers of revisions due to specific causes for the 4 time periods

Figure 2. Numbers of revisions for different causes, in 4 time periods.

Figure 2. Numbers of revisions for different causes, in 4 time periods.

Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier survival plots. Revision for any cause in 4 time periods. A. All prostheses. B. All cemented prostheses. C. All uncemented prostheses. D. All hybrid prostheses.

Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier survival plots. Revision for any cause in 4 time periods. A. All prostheses. B. All cemented prostheses. C. All uncemented prostheses. D. All hybrid prostheses.

Table 5a. Relative risk of overall revision (due to any cause), aseptic loosening of acetabular component, aseptic loosening of femoral component, dislocation, and infection adjusted for age sex, and diagnosis (OA vs. other). All prostheses, n = 101,550

Table 5b. Relative risk of overall revision (due to any cause), aseptic loosening of acetabular component, aseptic loosening of femoral component, dislocation, and infection adjusted for age sex, and diagnosis (OA vs. other). All cemented prostheses, n = 86,929

Figure 4. Kaplan-Meier survival plot. Revision for any cause. A. 1987–2007. B. 1998–2007.

Figure 4. Kaplan-Meier survival plot. Revision for any cause. A. 1987–2007. B. 1998–2007.

Table 5c. Relative risk of overall revision (due to any cause), aseptic loosening of acetabular component, aseptic loosening of femoral component, dislocation, and infection adjusted for age sex, and diagnosis (OA vs. other). Charnley prostheses with Palacos or Simplex cement, n = 28,225

Table 5d. Relative risk of overall revision (due to any cause), aseptic loosening of acetabular component, aseptic loosening of femoral component, dislocation, and infection adjusted for age sex, and diagnosis (OA vs. other). Other cemented prostheses, n = 58,704

Table 5e. Relative risk of overall revision (due to any cause), aseptic loosening of acetabular component, aseptic loosening of femoral component, dislocation, and infection adjusted for age sex, and diagnosis (OA vs. other). Uncemented prostheses, n = 14,621

Figure 5. Kaplan-Meier survival plot for cemented hip prostheses: every hospital in Norway in 2 time periods. A. 1987–1997. B. 1998–2008.

Figure 5. Kaplan-Meier survival plot for cemented hip prostheses: every hospital in Norway in 2 time periods. A. 1987–1997. B. 1998–2008.