3,062
Views
78
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Fast-track arthroplasty

1–year follow–up of 920 hip and knee arthroplasty patients after implementing fast–track

Good outcomes in a Norwegian university hospital

, , , , , & show all
Pages 78-85 | Received 14 Mar 2014, Accepted 14 Apr 2014, Published online: 01 Sep 2014

Figures & data

Table 1. Patient characteristics in the different groups (primary total hip arthroplasty and primary total knee arthroplasty; revision total hip arthroplasty and revision total knee arthroplasty)

Figure 1. Participants from inclusion until 1–year follow–up.

Figure 1. Participants from inclusion until 1–year follow–up.

Figure 2. Pain at rest (upper panel) and mobilization (lower panel) at 8 time points, from preoperatively until 1 year postoperatively. Lines represent mean pain score for each patient group.

Figure 2. Pain at rest (upper panel) and mobilization (lower panel) at 8 time points, from preoperatively until 1 year postoperatively. Lines represent mean pain score for each patient group.

Table 2. Patient–reported outcome scores (PROMS) in the 4 different groups: EQ–5D, HOOS–PS, KOOS–PS, and the physical function scores HHS and KSS. For abbreviations, see text. All scores were obtained preoperatively, 8 and 12 weeks postoperatively, and 1 year postoperatively. Data are mean (SD)

Table 3. Complications within 1 year of primary total hip arthroplasty or primary total knee arthroplasty

Table 4. Complications within 1 year of revision surgery for hip and knee patients