1,568
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The risk of revision in total knee arthroplasty is not affected by previous high tibial osteotomy

A 15-year follow-up of 32,476 total knee arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register

, , , &
Pages 734-739 | Received 26 May 2015, Accepted 27 May 2015, Published online: 10 Jun 2015

Figures & data

Figure 1. Example of extra-articular malalignment after high tibial osteotomy (HTO) with opening wedge technique. The red line on the left radiograph (a) indicates the mechanical axis lateral to the knee joint. The radiograph to the right (b) indicates the extra-articular angulation of the tibia in the osteotomy area.

Figure 1. Example of extra-articular malalignment after high tibial osteotomy (HTO) with opening wedge technique. The red line on the left radiograph (a) indicates the mechanical axis lateral to the knee joint. The radiograph to the right (b) indicates the extra-articular angulation of the tibia in the osteotomy area.

Figure 2. Example of intra-articular malalignment after high tibial osteotomy (WTO) with closing wedge technique. The solid red line indicates that the tibial plateau has been elevated medially and is not perpendicular to the tibial axis.

Figure 2. Example of intra-articular malalignment after high tibial osteotomy (WTO) with closing wedge technique. The solid red line indicates that the tibial plateau has been elevated medially and is not perpendicular to the tibial axis.

Figure 3. 31,077 primary total knee arthroplasties and 1,399 total knee arthroplasties after previous high tibial osteotomy (HTO) were selected for inclusion in the study. Total knee arthroplasties with a patellar component, uncemented total knee arthroplasty, knees treated with unicompartmental or revision implants, and uncommon implant brands were excluded.

Figure 3. 31,077 primary total knee arthroplasties and 1,399 total knee arthroplasties after previous high tibial osteotomy (HTO) were selected for inclusion in the study. Total knee arthroplasties with a patellar component, uncemented total knee arthroplasty, knees treated with unicompartmental or revision implants, and uncommon implant brands were excluded.

Table 1. Patient and procedure characteristics for TKA with and without previous HTO from 1994 to 2013 with the diagnosis osteoarthritis

Table 3. Reasons for revision

Table 2. Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, duration of surgery, and time period of surgery

Figure 4. 4,853 high tibial osteotomies with the procedure code NGK59 registered in the Norwegian Patient Register (NPR) from 1999 to 2013, showing the distribution of men and women. The NOMESCO (Nordic Social Statistical Committee) classification of surgical procedures was used.

Figure 4. 4,853 high tibial osteotomies with the procedure code NGK59 registered in the Norwegian Patient Register (NPR) from 1999 to 2013, showing the distribution of men and women. The NOMESCO (Nordic Social Statistical Committee) classification of surgical procedures was used.

Figure 5. Cox-adjusted survival curves for TKA with or without previous HTO, with revision for any reason as endpoint. The results of Cox regression analysis were adjusted for age, sex, duration of surgery, and time period.

Figure 5. Cox-adjusted survival curves for TKA with or without previous HTO, with revision for any reason as endpoint. The results of Cox regression analysis were adjusted for age, sex, duration of surgery, and time period.

Figure 6. Adjusted Cox regression curves comparing 3 time periods for TKA with or without previous HTO, with revision for any reason as the endpoint. The results of Cox regression analysis were adjusted for age, sex, and duration of surgery.

Figure 6. Adjusted Cox regression curves comparing 3 time periods for TKA with or without previous HTO, with revision for any reason as the endpoint. The results of Cox regression analysis were adjusted for age, sex, and duration of surgery.