507
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Bayesian cost-effectiveness analysis for censored data: an application to antiplatelet therapy

, &
Pages 434-443 | Accepted 14 Dec 2011, Published online: 30 Jan 2012

Figures & data

Table 1.  Baseline characteristics, medical history, and drug therapy during the follow-up.

Table 2.  Bayesian estimates and the corresponding 95% confident intervals for the parameters of the bivariate regression models under censored and non-censored assumptions.

Figure 1.  The comparison of cost-effectiveness between clopidogrel and aspirin. (a) Joint posterior sample of cost and effect differences on the CE plane. (b) Bayesian cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. The horizontal line indicated that posterior probability that INB is greater than zero is 0.5. (c) Bayesian 95% confidence intervals of INB (dashed lines) and the posterior means of INB (dotted lines).

Figure 1.  The comparison of cost-effectiveness between clopidogrel and aspirin. (a) Joint posterior sample of cost and effect differences on the CE plane. (b) Bayesian cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. The horizontal line indicated that posterior probability that INB is greater than zero is 0.5. (c) Bayesian 95% confidence intervals of INB (dashed lines) and the posterior means of INB (dotted lines).

Figure 2.  The comparison of cost-effectiveness between clopidogrel vs aspirin plus PPIs. (a) Joint posterior sample of cost and effect differences on the CE plane. (b) Bayesian cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. (c) Bayesian 95% confidence intervals of INB (dashed lines) and the posterior means of INB (dotted lines).

Figure 2.  The comparison of cost-effectiveness between clopidogrel vs aspirin plus PPIs. (a) Joint posterior sample of cost and effect differences on the CE plane. (b) Bayesian cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. (c) Bayesian 95% confidence intervals of INB (dashed lines) and the posterior means of INB (dotted lines).

Figure 3.  The comparison of cost-effectiveness between aspirin plus PPIs vs clopidogrel plus PPIs. (a) Joint posterior sample of cost and effect differences on the CE plane. (b) Bayesian cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. (c) Bayesian 95% confidence intervals of INB (dashed lines) and the posterior means of INB (dotted line).

Figure 3.  The comparison of cost-effectiveness between aspirin plus PPIs vs clopidogrel plus PPIs. (a) Joint posterior sample of cost and effect differences on the CE plane. (b) Bayesian cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. (c) Bayesian 95% confidence intervals of INB (dashed lines) and the posterior means of INB (dotted line).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.