753
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Cost-effectiveness of 3-year vs 1-year adjuvant therapy with imatinib in patients with high risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumour recurrence in the Netherlands; a modelling study alongside the SSGXVIII/AIO trial

, , , &
Pages 1106-1119 | Accepted 21 Jun 2013, Published online: 19 Jul 2013

Figures & data

Figure 1. Markov decision analytic model simulating the history of a cohort of patients with high risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumour recurrence. The figure depicts heath states during adjuvant imatinib therapy and for two possible treatment lines after tumour recurrence. The model structure reflects the clinical recommendations of the European Society for Medical Oncology, the clinical practice in the Netherlands, and has been validated by oncologists. At baseline, patients differ in terms of the length of adjuvant imatinib therapy (1 vs 3 years) that they are assigned to receive (A1 health state). No further differences in patients were assumed.

Figure 1. Markov decision analytic model simulating the history of a cohort of patients with high risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumour recurrence. The figure depicts heath states during adjuvant imatinib therapy and for two possible treatment lines after tumour recurrence. The model structure reflects the clinical recommendations of the European Society for Medical Oncology, the clinical practice in the Netherlands, and has been validated by oncologists. At baseline, patients differ in terms of the length of adjuvant imatinib therapy (1 vs 3 years) that they are assigned to receive (A1 health state). No further differences in patients were assumed.

Figure 2. Observed and extrapolated recurrence-free survival in patients with high risk of tumour recurrence.

Figure 2. Observed and extrapolated recurrence-free survival in patients with high risk of tumour recurrence.

Table 1. Main clinical and economic input values (mean, standard error, the distribution used in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis and the source of input data).

Figure 3. Predicted overall survival for patients receiving 1-year and 3-year adjuvant imatinib therapy.

Figure 3. Predicted overall survival for patients receiving 1-year and 3-year adjuvant imatinib therapy.

Table 2. Overall survival, quality-adjusted life years (undiscounted and discounted with 1.5%) and costs per patient (undiscounted and discounted with 4%), base case analysis.

Table 3. Results of the sensitivity analyses, incremental costs, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness ratios.

Figure 4. Scatterplot of incremental cost and incremental QALYs (base case scenario), and cost-effectiveness acceptability curve.

Figure 4. Scatterplot of incremental cost and incremental QALYs (base case scenario), and cost-effectiveness acceptability curve.
Supplemental material

Supplementary Material

Download PDF (504.1 KB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.