1,401
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original article

Cost-effectiveness of lurasidone vs quetiapine extended-release (XR) in patients with bipolar depression

, , , &
Pages 821-827 | Accepted 14 May 2015, Published online: 27 Jul 2015

Figures & data

Figure 1. Cost-effectiveness model structure. XR, extended-release.

Figure 1. Cost-effectiveness model structure. XR, extended-release.

Table 1. Mean rates of remission for lurasidone, quetiapine XR, and placebo in the short-term treatment of bipolar disorder.

Table 2. Resource utilization parameters (per 6 week time period).

Table 3. Cost parameters.

Table 4. Cost-effectiveness results.

Table 5. One-way sensitivity analysis results.

Figure 2. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. XR, extended-release; WTP, willingness-to-pay.

Figure 2. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. XR, extended-release; WTP, willingness-to-pay.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.