Abstract
Objective: To describe the duty/triage system within one urban area mental health service in Australia and to investigate the factors that affect the decision to organize a comprehensive assessment.
Method: Data was collected from 3 months of duty/triage information and key informant interviews. Policies and procedures related to duty/triage were reviewed. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted.
Results: Two thousand, six hundred and three contacts with duty/triage occurred over a 3-month period. Half of these were related to patients new to the service. Most contacts were self-referrals or referrals from a carer. Few referrals came through the primary health care sector. New patients were more likely to be assessed if the referral was presented in technical language and if it was initiated by a health professional, particularly a general practitioner, emergency department or other mental health service. Assessment was less likely if the patient or carer initiated the referral, if the problem was presented in vague or non-technical terms, if there was a drug or alcohol problem or if the person refused care.
Conclusions: A substantial number of potential patients contact a duty/triage worker every day. However, there is little interaction with the primary care sector, limited documentation of risk and a lack of consistency in the documented reasons for the service response. Further investigation is needed of the conditions conducive to consistent quality decision making at the point of entry to a specialist mental health service.