14
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The use of atosiban and ritodrine in external cephalic version

, &
Pages 927-929 | Received 20 Oct 2006, Published online: 03 Aug 2009
 

Abstract

Objective. To compare the efficacy of atosiban and ritodrine as tocolytic agents for successful external cephalic version (ECV). Factors affecting the success of ECV, as well as maternal and perinatal outcomes are reviewed. Method. A retrospective review of women who underwent ECV with either atosiban (2004) or ritodrine (2002). Results. Atosiban and ritodrine were similarly effective (28 versus 41%, p>0.05). Side effects were more common with ritodrine. No significant adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes were recorded following procedures with either tocolytic. Conclusion. Atosiban is a safe choice for ECV with less maternal side effects. However, it is no more effective than ritodrine and the benefit of safety has to be balanced against that of cost.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.