603
Views
59
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Interpreting Endwall and Sidewall Measurements in Shock-Tube Ignition Studies

Pages 1123-1144 | Received 23 Dec 2008, Accepted 15 Apr 2009, Published online: 08 Sep 2009
 

Abstract

Chemiluminescence emission from exited species such as OH* or CH* as well as pressure can be convenient and effective diagnostics for monitoring ignition delay times in shock-heated mixtures. Ideally, the ignition delay time obtained from the radical-species emission signal should agree with ignition delay time as obtained from the pressure trace. Under ideal shock-tube conditions, ignition behind the reflected shock wave occurs first at the endwall, so the measurement of endwall pressure is often considered the best way to determine ignition delay time when such an increase in pressure is available. However, the signal-to-noise ratio of data from a pressure transducer mounted in the endwall can be relatively low when compared to that of an emission signal, so the latter technique provides a useful alternative to pressure. In the present paper, an analytical model of endwall emission measurements is presented, and recent experimental results are studied to determine whether or not endwall measurements are better than sidewall measurements, and vice versa. The results of this work indicate that endwall emission measurements can lead to artificially longer ignition times under dilute conditions when the increase in the radical species can occur over a pre-ignition period on the order of a hundred microseconds or more. This longer apparent ignition time is a result of the integrated effect of the detector seeing ignition occurring at later times down the length of the driven section. Endwall emission should therefore not be used to infer ignition delay times in experiments where there is no significant pressure rise and the ignition event is not abrupt. However, it is shown from experiment and the simple optics model that endwall emission can, in contrast, be employed reliably to measure ignition delay times when the ignition event is abrupt, as in undiluted fuel-air mixtures. This paper also brings to light the differences between sidewall and endwall pressure measurements in highly reactive mixtures producing strong ignition events; in such experiments, ignition delay times inferred from sidewall measurements can be artificially shorter by as much as 30 microseconds or more.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work for this paper was supported by the National Science Foundation, grant number CBET-0832561. Additional support came from The Aerospace Corporation for the Air Force Space and Missile Systems Center under contract no. F04701-00-C-0009.

Notes

a Data for Mixture 6 are based on OH*emission, whereas CH* is recorded for all other mixtures.

In the original paper, only the endwall-derived ignition the difference between the peak and the ignition time were provided.

In the original paper, only the endwall-derived ignition the difference between the peak and the ignition time were provided.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,493.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.