Safety of craniotomy for brain tumor resection in octogenarians and older patients – a matched - cohort analysis

Abstract

Introduction

The incidence of brain tumors has increased in elderly population overtime. Their eligibility to a major surgery remains a questionable subject. This study evaluated prognostic factors and 30-days morbidity and mortality in octogenarian population who underwent craniotomy for resection of brain tumor.

Materials and methods

A total of 154 patients were divided into two different groups: patients above 80 years old and patients below 65 years old. In both groups, patients were stratified based on diagnosis with benign tumors [meningioma] and malignant tumors [high-grade gliomas and metastases]. Multivariable logistic regression model with backward elimination method was utilized to identify the independent risk factors for 30-days readmission and post-operative complications.

Results

The analysis revealed no significant difference in 30-day readmission (p = 0.7329), 30-day mortality (0.6854) or in post-operative complication (p = 0.3291) between age ≥ 80 and age ≤ 65 groups. A longer length of stay (LOS) was observed in the older patients (p = 0.0479). There was a significant difference in the pre-post KPS between the two groups (p < 0.0001). ASA (p = 0.0315) and KPS (p = 0.071) were found as important prognostic factors associated with post-operative mortality in both groups.

Conclusion

Octogenarians can withstand craniotomy without any significant increase in 30-day readmission, 30-day mortality and post-operative complications as compared to patients younger than age 65. The ASA score (>3) and/or KPS (<70) were the most important prognostic factors for 30-days readmission and mortality.

Keywords:

• Octogenarian population
• elderly
• brain tumors
• craniotomy
• geriatric oncology

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Correction Statement

This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.