1,790
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
EMPIRICAL ARTICLES

“Is That A Method of Birth Control?” A Qualitative Exploration of Young Women’s Use of Withdrawal

&
Pages 626-632 | Published online: 29 Oct 2015
 

Abstract

Despite its ubiquity, withdrawal is understudied as a family planning method. We investigated the context of and decision making around withdrawal use, drawing on in-depth, qualitative interviews with 38 Black and Latina women (ages 18 to 24). We examined contraceptive use histories to understand when and why participants used withdrawal. The majority of participants (n = 29; 76%) had used withdrawal in their lifetimes, though two-thirds of users mentioned withdrawal in their contraceptive histories only after interviewer prompts. Withdrawal was primarily used during transitions between contraceptive methods and when other methods were not desired. Relationship context was also an important factor, as many used withdrawal to increase intimacy with their partners; because they felt condoms were no longer necessary due to monogamy; or to fulfill their partners’ preferences to increase sexual pleasure. Our findings indicate that decision making around withdrawal is embedded in situational and relational contexts. Future research should explore how health care providers and sex educators can engage young women in discussions of withdrawal’s benefits and constraints. A harm reduction framework, which recognizes that optimal use of withdrawal is preferable to not using a pregnancy prevention method at all, may inform the ways that withdrawal can be addressed in clinical and educational settings.

Funding

This research was supported by an individual investigator grant from the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs at San Francisco State University. The authors thank Kelly Bermudes, Vanessa Cardona, Airial Clark, and Vanessa Torres for their work in designing the study, interviewing participants, and cleaning the data, and Elodia Villaseñor for providing feedback on the manuscript.

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by an individual investigator grant from the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs at San Francisco State University. The authors thank Kelly Bermudes, Vanessa Cardona, Airial Clark, and Vanessa Torres for their work in designing the study, interviewing participants, and cleaning the data, and Elodia Villaseñor for providing feedback on the manuscript.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 165.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.