124
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Western diets are not responsible for chronic acid retention: a critical analysis of organic acid and phosphate contribution

&
Pages 31-42 | Received 11 Apr 2017, Accepted 19 Nov 2017, Published online: 29 Nov 2017
 

Abstract

According to usual literature, the diet-dependent endogenous production of titratable acidity (TA) is contributed by sulphuric and phosphoric acids (NA) and by metabolizable acids (MAs), representing ‘net-endogenous acid production’ (NEAP). NEAP is mainly neutralised by diet-dependent salts of inorganic cations (), estimated in foods, faeces and urine from inorganic cation–anion difference (NB). It is claimed that urinary loss of organic acids’ anions, ‘’, induces metabolizable H+ ions’ retention. Since ‘’ is normally lost in urine as ‘’ or ‘’, no MA retention takes place. Therefore, in our approach, net acid production (NAP) reduces to endogenous sulphuric acidity only. Since in western diets (WDs) alkaline cations exceed inorganic anions (NB excess), acid excess from phosphorus is neutralized. Moreover, the renal reabsorption of ultra-filtered Pi takes place at ratios greater than ‘4/1’, which means that the kidney operates as a dietary Pi-dependent NB generator ( or ). Since, in standard WDs, H2SO4 generation is less than ‘’ production, the sulphuric acidity escaping the intestinal absorption is neutralized by and excreted as diet-dependent , without interfering in normal A/B status. Only when extreme acidifying diets are ingested, sulphuric acidity may exceed ‘’. In this case, the excess of sulphuric acidity production is neutralised by the intervention of urinary excretion, whose employment is normally restricted to prevent loss of ultra-filtered NB. Finally, the whole body NA balance (NAb(W)) is calculated from the difference ‘NAabs – NA(u)’, where abs = intestinal absorption and u = urinary excretion. Being ‘NAabs ≈ NA(u)’, NAb(W) approximates zero, confirming WDs as non-acidifying foods.

Acknowledgements

This research has received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or non-profit sectors.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. No experiment has been carried out on human beings or animals. The authors have contributed equally to the different sections of the paper.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 200.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.