962
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Methods in Addiction

Assessment of the validity of the CUDIT-R in a subpopulation of cannabis users

, PhD, , PhD, , PhD & , PhD
Pages 19-23 | Received 04 May 2017, Accepted 17 Aug 2017, Published online: 23 Oct 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Background: The Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test-Revised (CUDIT-R) is an 8-item measure used to screen for cannabis use disorders (CUD). Despite widespread use of the tool, assessments of the CUDIT-R’s validity in subpopulations are limited. Objectives: The current study tested the structural validity and internal consistency of one of the most widely used screening measures for CUD (i.e., CUDIT-R) among a sample of military veterans who use cannabis for medicinal purposes. Methods: The present study used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test the internal consistency and validity of the single-factor structure of the original screener among a sample of veterans who use cannabis for medicinal purposes (n = 90 [90% male]; Mage = 55.31, SD = 15.37). Measures included demographics and the CUDIT-R, obtained from the baseline assessment of an ongoing longitudinal study. Results: The CFA revealed that the single-factor model previously validated in recreational using samples only accounted for 38.34% of total variance in responses on the CUDIT-R (χ2 = 66.09, df = 28, p < 0.05; RMSEA = 0.06) and demonstrated acceptable but modest internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.73). Conclusion: More psychometric work is needed to determine the reliability and validity of using the CUDIT-R to screen for CUD among military veterans who use medicinal cannabis and other subpopulations of cannabis users.

Declaration of interest

Marcel Bonn-Miller works for a cannabinoid pharmaceutical company.

Funding

Work for this article was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Academic Affiliations, NCPTSD D&T Division VA-Sponsored Fellowship in PTSD Research and Treatment. The views expressed here are the authors’ and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Additional information

Funding

Work for this article was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Academic Affiliations, NCPTSD D&T Division VA-Sponsored Fellowship in PTSD Research and Treatment. The views expressed here are the authors’ and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 987.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.