635
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Perspective

Are you thinking what I’m thinking? Defining what we mean by “polysubstance use.”

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , & show all
Pages 1-7 | Received 21 Mar 2023, Accepted 10 Aug 2023, Published online: 21 Sep 2023
 

ABSTRACT

The rise in drug overdoses and harms associated with the use of more than one substance has led to increased use of the term “polysubstance use” among researchers, clinicians, and public health officials. However, the term retains no consistent definition across contexts. The current authors convened from disciplines including sociology, epidemiology, neuroscience, and addiction psychiatry to propose a recommended definition of polysubstance use. An iterative process considered authors’ formal and informal conversations, insights from relevant symposia, talks, and conferences, as well as their own research and clinical experiences to propose the current definition. Three key concepts were identified as necessary to define polysubstance use: (1) substances involved, (2) timing, and (3) intent. Substances involved include clarifying either (1) the number and type of substances used, (2) presence of more than one substance use disorder, or (3) primary and secondary substance use. The concept of timing is recommended to use clear terms such as simultaneous, sequential, and same-day polysubstance use to describe short-term behaviors (e.g., 30-day windows). Finally, the concept of intent refers to clarifying unintentional use or exposure when possible, and greater attention to motivations of polysubstance use. These three components should be clearly defined in research on polysubstance use to improve consistency across disciplines. Consistent definitions of polysubstance use can aid in the synthesis of evidence to better address an overdose crisis that increasingly involves multiple substances.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge Robert Raffa, Jason Ford, Abby Jones, Julian Santaella, Meredith Meacham.

Disclosure statement

ARW – receives consulting fees, equity, and travel expenses from Ophelia Health, Inc. a telehealth company for the treatment of opioid use disorder. SDC has received research funding within the past 3 years from Alkermes, BioXcel, Go Medical, Intra-cellular Therapies, Janssen, and Lyndra. SDC has also consulted for Alkermes, Opiant, and Syneos Health.

The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Funding

AMB – R13DA057083; K01DA053435; RDS – T32GM008244; ARW – R01 DA057566; R01 DA059042; ALC- K01AA026854; JL – R01DA049761; SDC – UH3DA047711; UG3DA056247

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 987.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.