104
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Examining medical students’ experience of gender-based discrimination and sexual harassment from clinical teachers at a UK medical school

ORCID Icon, , , & ORCID Icon
Received 25 Aug 2023, Accepted 12 Mar 2024, Published online: 02 Apr 2024
 

Abstract

Purpose of the article

To quantify the prevalence and characterise the nature of gender-based discrimination (GBD) and sexual harassment (SH) arising from clinical teachers towards medical students at one UK medical school.

Materials and methods

A mixed quantitative and qualitative survey of medical students. Chi-squared analysis and logistic regression was performed on quantitative data, while an inductive thematic analysis of qualitative data was undertaken. These findings were compared to look for common patterns.

Results

Females were significantly more likely to report experiencing both GBD (χ2 = 38.61, p < 0.0001) and SH (χ2 = 19.53, p < 0.0001) than males (OR = 10.45 (CI 4.84 − 22.56, p < 0.0001)). These behaviours were more likely to be reported in specific surgical placements than medical placements (χ2 = 15.06, p < 0.001 and χ2 = 5.90, p < 0.05). Perpetrators were more commonly male, and more commonly consultants. Exposure to GBD or SH was significantly more likely to affect the choice of specialty in females compared to males (χ2 = 11.17, p < 0.001). Students noted a casual use of sexist language, inappropriate sexual advances, and gender-based microaggressions which create a pervasive discrepancy in educational opportunities between genders. Participants reported that concerns regarding anonymity, questioning the severity of the incident, and an ingrained medical hierarchy prevented students reporting these incidents.

Conclusions

The rate of GBD and SH from clinical teachers to medical students remains high, affecting female students more than male students. This study highlights key areas that must be improved to achieve a more equitable teaching experience in UK medical schools. Developing robust reporting and support systems is an important step in eradicating these behaviours.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr Ruth Wilson, Dr Michael Dunn, and Dr Catherine Swales for their input, support, and guidance.

Ethical approval

Full ethics approval was granted by the university of Oxford (reference number R63172/RE001).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

No funding or sponsorship was received for the project.

Notes on contributors

Oliver Skan

Dr Oliver Skan, BM, BCh (hons), graduated from the University of Oxford in 2020 and is undertaking core training in London.

Laura Tregidgo

Dr Laura Tregidgo, BM, BCh (hons), graduated from the University of Oxford in 2020 and is undertaking core training in London.

James Tizzard

Dr James Tizzard, BM, BCh, graduated from the University of Oxford in 2020 and is undertaking core training in London.

Isabel Westlake

Dr Isabel Westlake, BM, BCh, graduated from the University of Oxford in 2020 and is undertaking core training in London.

Nikita Joji

Ms Nikita Joji, MBChB, BSc, MRCS, PG Dip, FHEA, graduated from the University of Birmingham in 2015 and is a plastic surgery speciality trainee in London.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 771.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.