103
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Obstetric

Comparing complications in intended vaginal and caesarean deliveries

, , &
Pages 64-68 | Published online: 02 Jul 2009
 

Summary

A hospital-based, prospective cohort study was conducted at the tertiary care university hospital in southern Thailand, between 1 November 2001 and 31 December 2003. The purpose of this study was to compare the various complications found in vaginal and caesarean deliveries based on the original elected intended mode of delivery. There were a total of 1,429 cases, 1,242 intended vaginal deliveries and 187 intended caesarean deliveries. Major and minor complication rates were found to be significantly lower in the intended vaginal delivery group compared with the intended caesarean delivery group (2.3% and 1.3% vs 4.8% and 3.7%; p < 0.05). The most common major complication was haemorrhage, which was found more frequently in the intended caesarean delivery group (OR 7.5, 95% CI 2.6 – 21.5). After statistical adjustment, an intended caesarean delivery was found to be an independent risk factor for complications.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.