451
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Impact of Braxton-Hicks contractions on fetal wellbeing; a prospective analysis through computerised cardiotocography

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 569-573 | Published online: 14 Aug 2021
 

Abstract

To estimate the correlation between the maternal perception of Braxton-Hicks contractions (BHC) and foetal wellbeing throughout antepartum computerised cardiotocography (cCTG) parameters, we performed a prospective observational study between April 2019 and March 2020. Non-labouring women with a term pregnancy were recruited. We collected data regarding maternal perception of BHC in the last two weeks before delivery. For each patient, an external computerised cardiotocography (cCTG) was registered. Women were subdivided in accordance with perception or non-perception of BHC. Fifty women were recruited. Women who felt BHC showed higher foetal heart rate (135 bpm vs 128 bpm, p = .008), lower long-term variability (47.2 ms vs 57.7 ms, p = .02) and reduced number of accelerations (7.8 vs 11.4, p = .04). In conclusion, the absence of mother's perception of BHC showed lower baseline foetal heart rate, increased number of accelerations and higher long-term variability related to mothers who perceived BHC.

    IMPACT STATEMENT

  • What is already known on this subject? BHC are common painful contractions that start in the third trimester. They are random spots of uterine action that happen in the absence of sufficient gap-junction connectivity. BHC have a significant impact on foetal wellbeing.

  • What do the results of this study add? BHC are associated with reduced long-term variability during cCTG examination. Moreover, baseline foetal heart rate seems lower, and accelerations are less frequent when BHC are felt by pregnant women.

  • What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? These findings could be related to a cumulative effect on the uterine flow mediated by BHC. Further researches are needed to state the impact of BHC on the foetal wellbeing.

Author contributions

M.L.V.: protocol development, data management and analysis, manuscript writing. G.R.: protocol development, manuscript writing. A.C and C.T.: data collection and analysis, manuscript revisiting. S.C. and M.M.: manuscript editing and revisiting. C.C. and N.C.: protocol development, data, manuscript revisiting. M.T. and P.D.F.: project supervising, manuscript revisiting. All the authors revised and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

All the authors have no conflicts of interest or financial conflicts to disclose.

Ethics approval

Ethical approval was not required since the study was classified as hospital audit of current clinical practice. We carried our research according to the Helsinki Declaration of 1975.

Trial registration

The study was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov database with ID no. NCT04417296.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.