892
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Case Report

A rare case of giant 5 mm port-site preperitoneal small-bowel incarceration without fascial defect following laparoscopic hysterectomy

, , , , ORCID Icon &

Introduction

The increased use of laparoscopy has resulted in certain complications specifically associated with the laparoscopic approach like port-site hernia (PSH). PSH following laparoscopic surgery is less common compared with incisional hernia occurring after open surgery. According to the literature, the incidence of PSH ranges from 0.2% to 3.1% (Swank et al. Citation2012). It is believed that port diameter and access technique affect the rate of hernia formation. In most of the reported cases, PSH appears when larger diameter port is used, in elderly and patients with higher body mass index (BMI). Extensive tissue manipulation, increased operative time and the effect of a partial vacuum while withdrawal of the port increase the risk of PSH formation (Tonouchi et al. Citation2004). Clinical signs include gross disruption of the wound and the drainage, presence of a bulge with exertion or Valsalva or painful bulge due to bowel or omentum incarceration. Patients usually present with clinical signs of bowel obstruction or infarction.

Case report

Forty-four-years old Para 4 presented second postoperative day with complaints of heavy abdominal pain and large intumescences in left lower abdomen. The patient underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingectomy due to high squamos intraepithelial lesion that persisted after loop conisation. After placing Veress needle and producing pneumoperitoneum an 11 mm umbilical blunt trocar was placed followed by three accessory 5 mm conical blunt trocars in the right, left and suprapubic regions under direct visualisation. Specimen was removed through vagina. Course of the operation was uneventful. Second day after the operation she presented with acute abdomen. Clinical manifestations (painful continuous bulge) developed after patient’s verticalisation. Computed tomography (CT) revealed incarceration of small-bowel that measured 120 × 100 × 90 mm in the left lower abdomen. Laparoscopic exploration revealed small-bowel preperitoneal incarceration that increased by bowel peristalsis but with small fascial defect (). Incarceration was resolved laparoscopically (). Fourteen centimetre of ileum was resected due to necrosis () through mini-laparotomy on the side of left port incision. After resolving small bowel incarceration, peritoneal, and insignificant fascial defects were visualised (). Termino-terminal 2-layer anastomosis was performed, peritoneum and fascia were closed with absorbable polyglycolic acid 2/0 suture. Although we have not measured the size of the fascial defect we believe that it did not exceed 10 mm. Histopathology revelled necrosis of the resected ileal loop. Intestinal necrosis occurred in spite of an urgent procedure, performed immediately after the CT scan. Forth postoperative day patient presented with heavy nasogatric tube retention (>4000 mL) during 12 h and with absent auscultatory signs of peristalsis. Repeated CT suspected large intestinal incarceration. Although there were no evident clinical signs of acute abdomen, on grounds of radiologic imaging appearance and previous procedures, laparotomy was performed. Bowel oedema without any signs of anastomosis disruption was revealed. Patient suffered from prolonged postoperative paralytic ileus that was resolved 6 d after the open surgery. She was discharged 14 d after the last procedure.

Figure 1. (a) Small-bowel preperitoneal incarceration in the site of the left port incision. (b) Incarceration was resolved laparoscopically. (c) Necrosis of the ileum was detected. (d) After resolving small-bowel incarceration small fascial defect was visualised.

Figure 1. (a) Small-bowel preperitoneal incarceration in the site of the left port incision. (b) Incarceration was resolved laparoscopically. (c) Necrosis of the ileum was detected. (d) After resolving small-bowel incarceration small fascial defect was visualised.

Discussion

PSH is relatively rare but serious complication defined as an incisional hernia occurring after laparoscopic procedures. Clinical presentation includes abdominal pain and distension, nausea, vomiting, and lack of bowel movement and/or flatulence. These symptoms generally occur within a few days after the surgery. If PSH is suspected ultrasonography and/or abdominal CT should be performed. PSH is classified into three types (Velasco et al. Citation1998, Tonouchi et al. Citation2004). The early-onset type indicates dehiscence of the anterior and posterior fascial plane and peritoneum. It develops within 2 weeks after the surgery, often presenting as a small-bowel obstruction. In the late-onset type, there is dehiscence of the anterior and posterior fascial plane and the hernia sac is the peritoneum that manifests as asymptomatic swelling several months after the surgery. The third type involves dehiscence of the whole abdominal wall, which is recognised as a protrusion of the intestine and other tissue (e.g. greater omentum). The majority of described PSH occurred at ≥10 mm port sizes and those of 5 mm after removal of the drain (Liu and McFadden Citation2000, James et al. Citation2021). Reliable data support a lower relative risk of overall complications with blunt than bladed trocars, even suggesting that nonbladed trocars may not need port closure (Moreaux et al. Citation2009, Gutierrez et al. Citation2020). Fascial closure is recommended for only extraumbilical port sites > 10 mm (Kadar et al. Citation1993).

Excessive BMI is recognised as an independent risk factor for preperitoneal herniation (Cottam et al. Citation2002). In this particular case, patient was overweight (BMI 29.3). Conical blunt 5 mm trocar was used but manipulation with the port was not excessive: trocar was inserted first time on the beginning of the operative procedure, second time for introducing wound closure device (V-locTM) and third time for taking out the needle. Drain was not inserted into the abdominal cavity. Much smaller preperitoneal small-bowel herniation into a 5-mm nonbladed right port-site has already been described (Huang et al. Citation2010).

To our knowledge, this is first case of giant small-bowel preperitoneal herniation into a left port-site without significant fascial defect after insertion of the 5 mm blunt trocar. Deflation of the pneumoperitoneum during port removal and/or patient’s overweight could be identified as risk factors for developing PSH.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was unnecessary due to nature of the study.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

References

  • Cottam, D. R., et al., 2002. Preperitoneal herniation into a laparoscopic port site without a fascial defect. Obesity Surgery, 12 (1), 121–123.
  • Gutierrez, M., et al., 2020. Does closure of fascia, type, and location of trocar influence occurrence of port site hernias? A literature review. Surgical Endoscopy, 34 (12), 5250–5258.
  • Huang, M., et al., 2010. Postoperative bowel herniation in a 5-mm nonbladed trocar site. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 14 (2), 289–291.
  • James, M., et al., 2021. A case of unusual evisceration through laparoscopic port site. Journal of Minimal Access Surgery, 17 (4), 559–561.
  • Kadar, N., et al., 1993. Incisional hernias after major laparoscopic gynecologic procedures. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 168 (5), 1493–1495.
  • Liu, C. D. and McFadden, D. W., 2000. Laparoscopic port sites do not require fascial closure when nonbladed trocars are used. American Surgeon, 66 (9), 853–854.
  • Moreaux, G., et al., 2009. Five-millimeter trocar site bowel eviscerations after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 16 (5), 643–645.
  • Swank, H. A., et al., 2012. Systematic review of trocar-site hernia. The British Journal of Surgery, 99 (3), 315–323.
  • Tonouchi, H., et al., 2004. Trocar site hernia. Archives of Surgery (Chicago, IL: 1960), 139 (11), 1248–1256.
  • Velasco, J. M., et al., 1998. Postlaparoscopic small bowel obstruction. Rethinking its management. Surgical Endoscopy, 12 (8), 1043–1045.