Bond strength analysis of post-installed rebar with chemical adhesive in concrete mixed with marble powder and glass fiber

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of marble powder as a part of fine aggregate and the addition of glass fiber on the bond strength of concrete and deformed high-strength post-installed steel rebars using the epoxy chemical as an adhesive. Five marble dust powder (MDP) substitution percentages (i.e. 0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, and 35%) and the addition of glass fiber (i.e. 0.5%, 1%, and 1.5%) were used. The performance of deformed high-strength post-installed rebars in conventional concrete and concrete modified with 35% marble powder and 1% glass fiber was examined here utilizing pull-out tests on a total of 96 specimens. To examine the bond behaviors of deformed high-strength post-installed rebars at the epoxy–conventional concrete interface and epoxy-modified concrete with MDP and glass fiber interface, test criteria included concrete compressive strength, anchorage depth of rebar into concrete, rebar diameter, and concrete cover to rebar diameter ratio. For post-installed high-strength deformed rebar, bond stress–slip relationships were determined, examined, and subsequently compared with prior work and readily available codes. It was found that none of the specimens exhibited pull-out failure and that the majority of them displayed concrete splitting, concrete rapture, or rebar rapture failure. This suggests that epoxy resins are particularly successful as bonding agents to retrofit concrete structures at the steel–concrete contact. A closed-form equation for predicting the bond strength for post-installed high-strength deformed rebar was also created using regression analyses on the experimental data. With a significant coefficient of determination (R² = 0.85) the observed predicted bond strengths and the test data were quite similar.

Keywords:

• Bond strength
• compressive strength
• post-installed high-strength rebar
• chemical adhesive
• rebar diameter
• failure mode
• anchorage depth
• regression analysis

View correction statement:

Correction

Correction Statement

This article was originally published with errors, which have now been corrected in the online version. Please see Correction (https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2023.2288743).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.