Comparison of cover crop termination methods for small-scale organic vegetable production: effect on soil fertility and health

Abstract

Termination methods and the timing of the termination of the cover crops are critical factors determining the efficacy of cover crops in improving soil fertility and quality. We hypothesized that different termination methods will produce varying quantities of organic residue which will affect microbial diversity and thereby nutrient cycling and availability. The objective of this study was to compare termination methods (roller-crimper, flail mowing, rotary mowing, sickle bar mowing, and occultation using black tarps) for fall-grown cover crop combination (hairy vetch-cereal rye) under organic vegetable production. Field experiments were carried out in three consecutive years (2018–2021) and soil samples were collected from 0 to 15 cm and processed for analysis. Soil organic matter content, nutrients, health parameters, enzymes, and microbial diversity were measured. Flail mowing significantly enhanced the potentially mineralizable nitrogen, available phosphorus, and active carbon. Total Phospholipid Fatty Acid (PLFA) analysis showed a 24% increase for flail mowed, 17% for rotary mowed, and 15% for sickle bar mowed termination methods. There was a significant increase in active carbon content which ranged from 38.9% (rotary mowed), 25.4% (sickle bar mowed), 23.5% (flail mowed), 16.4% for crimper rolled method, and with 2.8% (occultation) respectively. Individual termination methods had varying effects on select enzyme activities. Results indicated that integrating cover crops has the potential to modify soil microbial community structure and increase soil enzyme activities. In this study, flail mowing appeared to be a good method for managing cover crops of choice in terms of soil microbial functionality and fertility.

Keywords:

• Cover crop termination
• enzyme activities
• organic production
• soil health

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing interests that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available within a reasonable request.

Additional information

Funding

This project was funded by the USDA/NIFA/Organic Agriculture Research & Extension Initiative (Award No. 2017-51300-26810).