436
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Erratum

Erratum

Page 327 | Published online: 09 Jul 2009
View correction statement:
Erratum
This article refers to:
Erratum

The publishers would like to apologize for an error that occured in

Int. J. Hyperthermia, March 2007; 23(2): 105–120

Role of acoustic cavitation in the delivery and monitoring of cancer treatment by high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU)

C. C. COUSSIOS, C. H. FARNY, G. TER HAAR, & R. A. ROY

The correct is shown below:

Figure 3. (a) Measured temperature rise (labeled ‘Thermocouple’) and PCD output (labeled ‘PCD’) as a function of time for a 1-s 1.1-MHz HIFU insonation of an agar-graphite tissue phantom at three different pressure amplitudes. No inertial cavitation occurs in (iii), whilst cavitation onsets halfway through the exposure in (ii) and at the start of exposure in (i). In (ii) and (iii), there is a dramatic increase in the observed rate of heating that is coincident with the onset of inertial cavitation activity. (b) Peak temperature rise with respect to ambient conditions vs. peak-positive acoustic pressure for the agar/graphite phantom subjected to 700-ms bursts of HIFU. The thermocouple is positioned in the HIFU focal plane 0.5 mm off axis. The ‘Linear Theory’ curve is computed from the bioheat transfer equation (BHTE) using the known pressure field characteristics. This phantom was only slightly degassed [81, 99, 137].

Figure 3. (a) Measured temperature rise (labeled ‘Thermocouple’) and PCD output (labeled ‘PCD’) as a function of time for a 1-s 1.1-MHz HIFU insonation of an agar-graphite tissue phantom at three different pressure amplitudes. No inertial cavitation occurs in (iii), whilst cavitation onsets halfway through the exposure in (ii) and at the start of exposure in (i). In (ii) and (iii), there is a dramatic increase in the observed rate of heating that is coincident with the onset of inertial cavitation activity. (b) Peak temperature rise with respect to ambient conditions vs. peak-positive acoustic pressure for the agar/graphite phantom subjected to 700-ms bursts of HIFU. The thermocouple is positioned in the HIFU focal plane 0.5 mm off axis. The ‘Linear Theory’ curve is computed from the bioheat transfer equation (BHTE) using the known pressure field characteristics. This phantom was only slightly degassed [81, 99, 137].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.