381
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The management of minor head trauma (GCS 15-13) across a Trauma Network

, &
Pages 536-540 | Received 15 Jul 2015, Accepted 03 Jul 2016, Published online: 18 Aug 2016
 

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the variations in the management of patients with minor head injuries across a Trauma Network.

Methods: An 18-point questionnaire covering aspects of hospital care and follow-up of patients with minor head injuries was sent out to 19 wards in 10 different trauma units within our network.

Results: Fifty-eight percent of wards routinely admitting patients with minor head injuries have no management protocol in place. Mild head injury patients stay for 24–48 h as in-patients. Fifty percent of wards use GCS as the only assessment tool. Seventy-four percent of wards give post-head injury advice to their discharged patients with mild head injuries, but only 26% follow their patients up locally and 16% refer minor head injury patients to the specialist neurotrauma clinic. Twenty one percent of wards give information to their head injury patients regarding supporting organisations and charities. Seventy-four percent of ward staff report being confident in looking after head injury patients. All wards would welcome a head injury study day or an in-house education event.

Conclusion: Management of minor head injury patients in trauma units should be standardised and neurosurgical units within Major Trauma Centres (MTC) need to lead in protocol based management of these patients across their network. NICE currently provide guidance detailing local management of head injuries not requiring immediate admission to the MTC. We believe it is the role of the neurosurgical centre to work with trauma units and provide guidelines and standards of practice to ensure optimal management of this vulnerable population group. In addition, the neuroscience centre has a role in ensuring staff education and on-going professional development across Trauma Networks.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 764.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.