4,792
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

Tremor as a symptom of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & show all
Pages 340-345 | Received 25 Aug 2021, Accepted 20 Jan 2022, Published online: 08 Feb 2022

Abstract

Background

AO Spine RECODE-DCM (Research objectives and common data elements for degenerative cervical myelopathy) has highlighted that the subjective disability reported by people living with DCM is much broader than routinely considered today by most professionals. This includes a description of tremor. The objective of this review was to study the incidence and possible aetiology of tremor in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM).

Methods

A systematic review registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020176905) was conducted in Embase and MEDLINE for papers studying tremor and DCM published on or before the 20th of July 2020. All manuscripts describing an association between tremor and DCM in humans were included. Articles relating to non-human animals, and those not available in English were excluded. An analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA and SWiM guidelines for systematic reviews.

Results

Out of a total of 4402 screened abstracts, we identified 7 case reports and series describing tremor in 9 DCM patients. Papers were divided into three groups for the discussion. The first group includes DCM correctly identified on presentation, with tremor as a described symptom. The second group includes cases where DCM was misdiagnosed, often as Parkinson’s disease. The third group includes a single case with a previous history of DCM, presenting with an otherwise unexplained tremor. This grouping allows for the clustering of cases supporting various arguments for the association between tremor and DCM.

Conclusion

DCM can be associated with tremor. The current evidence is restricted to case series. Further study is warranted to establish tremor prevalence, and its significance to assessment and management.

Introduction

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a chronic neurological condition of symptomatic cervical spinal cord compression secondary to degenerative spinal pathology.Citation1,Citation2 Accurate epidemiological data on DCM are scarce, owing to the fact that the condition remains severely under- and misdiagnosed.Citation3,Citation4

DCM is often progressive and in extreme circumstances may lead to paralysis.Citation5 Surgical decompression of the cervical spinal cord is currently the only evidence-based treatment.Citation6–8 It is able to halt disease progression, and in most cases offer meaningful recovery. However very few patients make a complete or near complete recovery, often being left with life-long disabilities. Consequently, DCM can severely impact quality of life of patientsCitation9 and their carers.Citation10 Timely management is therefore a critical priority to improving outcomes, as identified by AO Spine RECODE-DCM.Citation11 However, this requires early identification of DCM patients to facilitate close monitoring,Citation12 and appropriately timed surgical intervention.Citation6

Early identification has proven difficult. Typical DCM symptoms including neck pain and stiffness, limb pain, weakness, stiffness, numbness, paraesthesia, deterioration of manual dexterity, balance and coordination disturbance and autonomic dysfunction such as poor control of the bladder and bowels.Citation1,Citation13–15 However there is emerging evidence that this description underrepresents the DCM phenotype, a knowledge gap that might be contributing to late detection.Citation16,Citation17 Amongst the additional symptoms identified in a recent DELPHI survey of 224 people living with DCM, tremor emerged as a symptom reported by around 40% of patients.Citation16

The aim was therefore to systematically review the literature for evidence on the incidence, nature and diagnostic utility of tremor in adults with DCM, to further evaluate the association between tremor and DCM.

Methods

Systematic searches were conducted in Embase and MEDLINE via Ovid in accordance with Peer Review of Electronic Research Strategies (PRESS),Citation18 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)Citation19 and Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) guidelines.Citation20 The review was registered in the international Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, CRD42020176905).

Searches were conducted for all the studies reporting tremor in the setting of DCM on the 20th of July 2020 using an adapted version of a previously-established search strategy for DCM in MEDLINE.Citation21 The searches were performed for all entries available up until the date of the search, with no limits imposed. The full search strategies are described in Supplementary Appendix 1.

Title and abstract of each paper were screened independently by two separate investigators (MEK and CP or YH) using the Rayyan web and mobile app for systematic review (Qatar Computing Research Institute, Doha).Citation22 Two investigators (MEK and AEK) independently reviewed the full text articles. Any instances of disagreement about inclusion of a paper were discussed until a mutual agreement was established. Clinical studies of any design were included if there was a report of tremor in a patient who was diagnosed with DCM. This included abstracts, case reports, and case series. Initially, case reports and series were excluded. However, paucity of on tremor in DCM prompted a revision of the inclusion criteria to include the case reports and conference abstracts before re-screening. Articles were excluded if there was no mention of both tremor and DCM, if the text was not available in English, or if the study investigated cadavers, animals, or tissue samples.

Data from the included papers were extracted by two investigators (MEK and AEK) independently using a pre-established extraction criteria agreed by all authors. Patient demographics, presenting complaint, initial diagnosis, report of tremor, onset (acute/chronic), comorbidities and past medical history, radiological findings, management, and outcomes were extracted. The risk of bias within each study included was assessed used the Evidence Based Spine-Care Journal’s definition for class and strength of evidence;Citation23 no risk of bias across studies was identified, and no methods of additional analysis were used.

Papers were divided into two groups based on whether DCM was initially diagnosed after a patient presented with a tremor, or whether the patients presenting with tremor were initially diagnosed with another entity, and diagnosis revised after imaging investigation. This was to highlight the importance of considering DCM as a differential diagnosis when a patient presents with a tremor and consider whether there were any important differences between the correctly and mis-diagnosed groups.

Statistical analysis

A synthesis without meta-analysis was deemed most appropriate based on characterisation of the extracted data,Citation20 specifically the absence of any primary research investigating the incidence of tremor in DCM, but the identification of a number of case reports and case series that describe this association.

Results

A total of 4475 manuscripts were identified by the searches; 4402 remained following the removal of duplicates. Overall, 4395 manuscripts were excluded in the initial screen as they did not investigate or report tremor in the context of DCM. A total of 7 papers were further assessed for eligibility; all 7 were included in the qualitative analysis ().

Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram.

Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram.

The extracted data are summarised in . All included papers have a high risk of bias, owing to the nature of the publication being a case reportCitation23 ().

Table 1. Nine cases relating tremor and DCM from 5 case reports and 2 case series.

We identified 4 cases where DCM was correctly diagnosed, with tremor as one of the reported symptoms.Citation24–26 Two of these cases report a complete resolution of the tremor following surgical management of DCM.Citation25,Citation26 One report describes the development of a right upper limb kinetic tremor 2 weeks following surgical management of DCM.Citation24 Finally, a case by Perez et al. does not directly discuss the progression of the tremor, but reports the resolution of tremor following spinal neurostimulation.Citation25

Furthermore, there were 4 patients who were initially diagnosed with a different entity.Citation27–29 In 3 out of the 4 cases this was believed to be Parkinson’s disease.Citation27,Citation28 In all 4 cases, the diagnosis of DCM was made after radiological evidence of cervical spinal cord compression. Only one case describes outcomes following DCM management, and reports complete resolution of the tremor 8 weeks after cervical discectomy.Citation28

One additional case report describes an association between tremor and DCM in a patient with Parkinson’s Disease and a history of previous cervical myelopathy.Citation30 He was treated with a subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation,without improvement of PD symptoms. The patient continued to experience residual symptoms, including tremors.

Discussion

DCM is severely underdiagnosed and misdiagnosed.Citation3 Tremor is not often considered as a symptom of DCM.Citation1 In our systematic review, a number of cases reporting an association between tremor and DCM were identified, supporting the findings of our recent study that tremor may be a possible presentation of DCM. At present, the quality of evidence is low.

Findings in context

In the cases presented by Perez et al. and Magalhães et al., patients reported a tremor as part of their presenting symptoms, which led to a correct initial diagnosis of DCM.Citation25,Citation26 Following surgical intervention, the tremor in these cases fully resolved. These findings thus support a myelopathic aetiology to the tremor, however the underlying anatomical basis pertaining to tremor aetiology may not necessarily be limited directly to the cervical spinal cord given the emerging evidence for plasticity throughout the brain both in untreated DCM and following decompressive surgery for DCM.Citation31 Given that tremor is classically associated with basal ganglia and cerebellar networks,Citation32 it may well be that DCM precipitates plasticity within these networks, indirectly leading to tremor. Future studies on the timing of resolution of tremor following decompressive surgery and its correlation with other symptoms and neuraxial imaging may help delineate the mechanism.

Additionally, one of the papers presented a case of DCM with a new onset of tremor two weeks following C2-C6 posterior laminectomy.Citation24 The aetiology of this tremor is unclear but may well be a directl result of the spinal cord injury, which constitutes the pathophysiological mechanism of DCM or a knock on effect on the more traditional tremor-generating networks within extrapyramidal structures following decompression. The longevity of this tremor may help with untangling this.

Four cases were identified in the literature where patients presenting with a tremor were initially misdiagnosed. In three of these cases, the patients were initially worked up for Parkinson’s disease, with the correct diagnosis of DCM only being reached following spinal imaging. This is likely due to the absence of a well-known association of tremor with DCM, and its classical association with other diseases such as PD. The reports by Ali et al. do not specify whether a tremor was detected on presentation; the authors characterise PD as a disease of tremor and bradykinesia, and report missing the diagnosis of DCM in favour of PD.Citation27

Furthermore, the case by Farris et al. presents a patient with a previous history of DCM who underwent deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus for parkinsonian tremor. Due to residual tremor following a procedure that normally shows marked improvement of symptoms, it was hypothesised that deep brain stimulation resulted in the unmasking of a DCM-associated tremor.Citation30

Diagnostic implications

The diagnostic steps advised would be referral along an agreed local musculoskeletal pathway for an MRI cervical spine if a presentation fits with possible DCM. If Parkinson’s disease, or another tremor disorder is a strong differential, referral for a neurology opinion would be advised. Importantly, the message is that tremor can occur in DCM and the presence of tremor should not in itself lead to the dismissal of DCM as a possible differential diagnosis.

DCM Tremor-aetiology

One potential mechanism by which these tremors could arise is through the disruption of supraspinal inhibition of stretch reflex loops in the spinal cord secondary to mechanical compression. Central oscillators in the spinal cord may be disinhibited, resulting in rhythmic muscle contractions. This hypothesis, developed by Dimitrijevic,Citation33 is further explored in the case report by Fraix et al.Citation24 An alternative hypothesis suggests spinal cord compression precipitates plasticity and reorganisation in cortical and subcortical structures. For example, spinal decompression for the treatment of DCM leads to a significant reduction in activity in the supplementary motor area (SMA).Citation31 This may well be involved in the resolution of the tremors described in the case reports above, owing to this area’s connection with the cerebellum and basal ganglia.Citation34 A first step in testing these hypotheses requires high-quality primary evidence better characterising the features of tremor in DCM patients, its relationship to other symptoms, association with clinical and radiological disease characteristics and response to surgical management.

Limitations

The findings presented above all constitute case reports and conference abstracts of clinician experiences, and therefore represent low quality of evidence. Nevertheless, these reports, illustrate the difficulty surrounding DCM diagnosis and identify an avenue for research that may improve diagnostic reasoning in DCM.

Initially, case reports and series were excluded in the screening process. However, the absence of any primary literature investigating the association between tremor and DCM prompted a revision of the inclusion criteria to include the case reports and conference abstracts before re-screening the papers that were identified by the search. It is important to note that the absence of primary literature does not necessarily indicate an absence of relation between tremor and DCM, but simply that the association has not yet been investigated.

The significance of these findings should be interpreted in the context of their relevance to patient outcomes. A survey administered by the international DCM charity Myelopathy.org aimed to identify the priorities of patients with DCM and showed a significant prevalence of tremor in DCM patients, with 42% of them reporting hand shaking symptoms, and 38% reporting leg shaking symptoms.Citation16 In addition, tremor was reported to have a significant impact on the quality of life of patients who were diagnosed with DCM, thus is a potential symptom for which targeting interventions may improve patient quality of life.

Conclusion

Diagnosis of DCM requires a high index of suspicion. This analysis suggests that tremor is a possible presenting symptom for DCM, and its presence should not necessarily direct the focus of clinicians away from DCM towards other neurological conditions that are more classically associated with tremor, such as Parkinson’s disease. Clinicians should be particularly wary of worsening tremors in the setting of pre-existing tremor causing conditions. Additional research is required to study tremor in the setting of DCM and to identify targets for medical therapy of such tremors, which could significantly improve the quality of life of people with DCM.

Disclaimers

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (18 KB)

Disclosure statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Funding

Research in the senior author’s laboratory is supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. MRK is supported by a National Institute for Health Research Clinician Scientist Award. This report is independent research arising from a Clinician Scientist Award, CS-2015-15-023, supported by the National Institute for Health Research. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the National Institute for Health Research, or the Department of Health and Social Care. BMD is supported by an NIHR Clinical Doctoral Fellowship. ODM is supported by an Academic Clinical Fellowship.

References

  • Tracy JA, Bartleson JD. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurologist 2010;16:176–87.
  • Nouri A, Tetreault L, Singh A, Karadimas SK, Fehlings MG. Degenerative cervical myelopathy: Epidemiology, genetics, and pathogenesis. Spine 2015;40:E675–E693.
  • Davies BM, Mowforth OD, Smith EK, Kotter MRN. Degenerative cervical myelopathy. BMJ 2018;k186.
  • Behrbalk E, Salame K, Gilad J, Keynan O, Zczyk BB, Lidar Z. Delayed diagnosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy by primary care physicians. FOC 2013;35(1):E1.
  • St. Clair S, Bell GR. Natural History of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. Semin Spine Surg 2007;19:2–5.
  • Fehlings MG, Tetreault LA, Riew KD, et al. A clinical practice guideline for the management of patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: recommendations for patients with mild, moderate, and severe disease and nonmyelopathic patients with evidence of cord compression. Global Spine J 2017;7:70S–83S.
  • Fehlings MG, Ibrahim A, Tetreault L, et al. A global perspective on the outcomes of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Results from the prospective multicenter aospine international study on 479 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015;40:1322–8.
  • Fehlings MG, Wilson JR, Kopjar B, et al. Efficacy and safety of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy results of the aospine north america prospective multi-center study. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A 2013;95:1651–8.
  • Oh T, Lafage R, Lafage V, et al. Comparing quality of life in cervical spondylotic myelopathy with other chronic debilitating diseases using the short form survey 36-health survey. World Neurosurg 2017;106:699–706.
  • Mowforth OD, Davies BM, Kotter MR. Quality of life among degenerative cervical myelopathy carers: Cross-sectional questionnaire study. J Med Internet Res 2019;21:e12381.
  • Research Priorities. 2020. https://aospine.aofoundation.org/research/recode-dcm/research-priorities. [Accessed 9 October 2020].
  • Mowforth OD, Davies BM, Kotter MR. The use of smart technology in an online community of patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. JMIR Form Res 2019;3: e11364.
  • Brain WR, Northfield D, Wilkinson M. The neurological manifestations of cervical spondylosis. Brain 1952;75:187–225.
  • Davies BM, Munro CF, Kotter MRN. A novel insight into the challenges of diagnosing degenerative cervical myelopathy using web-based symptom checkers. J Med Internet Res 2019;21:e10868.
  • Mowforth OD, Davies BM, Kotter MR. “I am not delusional!” Sensory dysaesthesia secondary to degenerative cervical myelopathy. BMJ Case Rep 2019;12:e229033.
  • Davies BM, Munro C, Khan DZ, et al. Outcomes of degenerative cervical myelopathy from the perspective of persons living with the condition: findings of a semistructured interview process with partnered internet survey. Glob Spine J 2020;219256822095381.
  • Waqar M, Wilcock J, Garner J, Davies B, Kotter M. Quantitative analysis of medical students’ and physicians’ knowledge of degenerative cervical myelopathy. BMJ Open 2020;10:e028455.
  • McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2016;75:40–6.
  • Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009; 339:b2700.
  • Campbell M, McKenzie JE, Sowden A, et al. Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: Reporting guideline. BMJ 2020; 368:l6890.
  • Davies BM, Goh S, Yi K, Kuhn I, Kotter MRN. Development and validation of a MEDLINE search filter/hedge for degenerative cervical myelopathy. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018;18:73
  • Mourad O, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2016;5:210
  • Definition of Classes of Evidence (CoE) and Overall Strength of Evidence (SoE). Evid Based Spine Care J 2013;04:167.
  • Fraix V, Delalande I, Parrache M, Derambure P, Cassim F. Action-induced clonus mimicking tremor. Mov Disord 2008;23:285–288.
  • Perez JHT, Voll C, Shararah S. Treatment of spinal myoclonus due to degenerative compression myelopathy with cervical spinal cord stimulation: a report of 2 cases. World Neurosurg 2020;136:44–48.
  • Magalhães AD, Oliviera Santos M, Faria de Abreu LP, Teixeira J, Simas N, Coelho M. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy causing cerebellar type subacute ataxia. Eur J Neurol 2015;22:322.
  • Ali R, Huda S, Steiger MJ, Fletcher NA. The misdiagnosis of Parkinson’s disease in serious disability. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009;80:15.
  • Goh M, Kaliya-Perumal A-K, Oh J. Tremors as an atypical presentation of cervical myelopathy. J Med Sci 2019;39:296–298.
  • Cerami C, Valentino F, Piccoli F, La Bella V. A cervical myelopathy with a Hirayama disease-like phenotype. Neurol Sci 2008;29:451–454.
  • Farris SM, Giroux ML. Gait changes after deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease in a patient with cervical myelopathy. NRE 2008;23:263–265.
  • Sawada M, Nakae T, Munemitsu T, Hojo M. Cortical Reorganizations for Recovery from Depressive State After Spinal Decompression Surgery. World Neurosurg 2018;112:e632–e639.
  • Hallett M. Tremor: Pathophysiology. Park Relat Disord 2014;20:S118–S122.
  • Dimitrijevic MR, Nathan PW, Sherwood AM. Clonus: The role of central mechanisms. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1980;43:321–332.
  • Bostan AC, Dum RP, Strick PL. Cerebellar networks with the cerebral cortex and basal ganglia. Trends Cogn Sci 2013;17:241–254.